I was joking about the Imperium and 2 dimensions, that was intended to be a light hearted remark regarding the 2d vs 3d Traveller discussion.
I'm actually fairly familiar with the local star density in 3 dimensions, I'm in the process of importing the Gaia DR1 data (
https://i.imgur.com/zLgB7cD.png ) in order to get a good look at the data with one purpose being an attempt to map an imperium onto it, though I've paused that until DR2 is available, which has data from the RV spectrometer as well (with DR1 you can't get a full 3d solution for both position and velocity, which I need).
I'm sure an Imperium could be retrofitted onto 3d space yet keep the concept of remote government, but that would be throwing out several decades worth of material. I do like 3d space for gameplay reasons, you can plot a local sky map from any point and note important stars and how they appear in a random sky and given the random tilts that the various ecliptic planes that we know of have it feels like it fits spaceflight a bit more if you're not always immediately heading away from your launch point in the same plane.
I mentioned in an earlier thread, but with Traveller 5 rules at least, Jumpspace and realspace are 1:1 mapped to each other, at least by implication, as you can travel between stars slower than light and there's no indication that the distances should be treated differently than they appear on the sector maps.
-------- Original Message --------
On January 28, 2018 9:25 PM, Douglas Berry <dberry49xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please go to
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=0og3DHdoRHgL9lI7peOXYWnk6UF4c1zE