On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Kelly St. Clair <xxxxxx@efn.org> wrote:

On 2/15/2016 9:44 AM, Richard Aiken wrote:

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list)
<xxxxxx@simplelists.com <mailto:xxxxxx@simplelists.com>> wrote:

    So, I do not accept that it cannot be possible that, w/i the TU, it
    will still be possible to lose ships w/o a trace..


If ships can NOT be lost without a trace within the TU, then how do we
explain all those accidental colonies which started out as the survivors
of crash-landed ships?

You're not in disagreement.  Phil just layered his negatives and possibles a little too deeply/confusingly there.

Oh! I know! Sorry!

My reply was actually aimed at G. Chalik, not at Phil. I guess I should have made that explicit. 

--

Richard Aiken

"Never insult anyone by accident."  Robert A. Heinlein

"I studied the Koran a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as Muhammed." Alexis de Tocqueville (1843)

"We know a little about a lot of things; just enough to make us dangerous." Dean Winchester

"It has been my experience that a gun doesn't care who pulls its trigger." Newton Knight (as portrayed by Matthew McConaughey), to a scoffing Confederate tax collector facing the weapons held by Knight's young children and wife.

-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto 
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=JydxSB9tZc6TS63HiAHJcg6SAwighNGJ