>It's a bit overwhelming and I'm not as up on the design sequences as you are! So far, my contributions have been more along the lines of where I think >rules need to be changed, as opposed to how they are applied ...

Personally, I think you made sense that back-up system doesn’t need crew or power calculated since the only time those items are needed is when the primary system is off-line. Of course your comment was a lot clearer than mine which led Guy Garnett to agree to not allocating crew or power for the back-up.

I think that everyone agrees that you're doing yeoman work with this and that anyone doing a design sequence should be running it past you!

I do have a talent for yeoman work, but I am not knowledgeable enough to be the go to person for the QSDS yet. I am still feeling my way through TNE FF&S and T4.

Hopefully, the sensor material has enough information so that others can verify that I’ve read the fixed versus folding array requirement correctly. However, the most important item is that my math and the formulas used to get the numbers are correct.

Thank you for the positive feedback.

Tom Rux

-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to listmom@travellercentral.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto 
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=zZOCJCw2BI9jPrGTB4OJoibiHbbTEiok