I agree. I was responding to the general comment about treaties in the 20s and 30s vs. particular ones.
I certainly had in mind the limitations on what Germany could build.
My point about how it was a battle between colonial powers who still had Kings, Queens, Kaisers, etc. that were all interrelated was just to say no nation is blameless.
Versaille may have been justified, but it almost guaranteed WWII would happen.
To start arming for another shot at the prize a nation didn't get in the last war (a pretty common theme at least all the way through the 1600s and up into the early 20th century) was I suppose inevitable and in that case, I'd expect all manner of chicanery in fudging the rules or flouting them. (Iran's nuclear program is a more modern example)