It simply doesn't make sense that the problems could be solved for Hypervelocity guns, but not High Velocity or Medium Velocity guns.

No. Sense. At. All.

E

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 7:50 PM <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

I figured it was 'Hypervels become available at TL-6, aren't too good nor is their ammo, by TL-7, they fix all that' but unless they assume a much more capable round architecture than we've come up with, it would be a big gain and it does seem pretty darn good. 

Mind you, make a TL-15 version of the 120mm and Hyper V and you get:

HE: (off chart, extrapolated) 25/5/5

KEAP: 46

HEAP: 44

There are some interesting dynamics between the straight out bonuses (+X) vs. counting up/down rows (dependent on the chart and the HEAP penetration capability growth peters out in the very largest guns).

Maybe something fair might be Up 2 or 3 for TL-7. (Or maybe some brilliant Vilani scientist came up with a solution that is classified...)

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:06 PM Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

On 13Jul2020 1152, Ethan McKinney wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that the TL 7+ hypervelocity no shift for HEAP is just
> wrong.
It does seem rather excessively good.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>

-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please go to
http://archives.simplelists.com

-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please go to
http://archives.simplelists.com

-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please go to
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=RDHE7iRpfwqlHvVvWBIhpJZsbTiD5NnL