On Friday, April 19, 2019, 6:55:49 PM MST, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:


On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:48 PM Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote:
. . . the romans thought that witnessing mortal combat actually enhanced the civic strength of the community!

I suspect that this had something to do with misplaced nostalgia. There is evidence that gladiatorial combats originated as part of Early Kingdom Roman (perhaps even Etruscan) funeral rites. Also, it was part of the Roman mythos that the virile Republican Romans fought their own battles. Of course, by the Late Empire Romans were hiring their fighting done. So having these minature "battles" take place regularly in the city could have been a way to cling to outdated virtues, yet avoid having to risk actual Roman lives.
  
--
Richard Aiken
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Good points.

I hadn't heard about the 'funerary' angle.

It would also jibe with the disdain the Romans historically felt toward Carthage for frequently relying on mercenaries while they (Romans) raised armies of citizens.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------