2 messages:

1)_____

Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 12:56:50 -0400
From: Nancy Burns <nburns@PHOENIX.PRINCETON.EDU>
Subject: Re: Correct 362 (Dee Neff)

        I think it should be:
 Vol. 1, no. 1 (Jan. 1865)-v. 35, no. 819 (Jan. 1903) ; 2nd ser., v. 1
(Sept. 1903)-2nd ser., v. 54 (Apr. 1953) ; 3rd ser., v. 1 (Mar. 1951)-
        The parallel whole numbering (used in the original series) is
recorded with the vol. numbering, as long as there is not within-v.
numbering as well.  The series designation is repeated after the hyphen.
Vol. is abbreviated to v. when it is not at the beginning of the
statement.
        Ideally, you would also include any within-v. numbers, (e.g. 2nd
ser., v. 1, no. 1); but with retrospective conversions, this information
is often unknown.

                                         Nancy Burns
                                         Cataloging Unit IV
                                         Princeton University Library

> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 12:14:03 -0400
> From: Dee Neff <Dee.Neff@FURMAN.EDU>
> Subject: Correct 362
>
> I appeal to my fellow serialists to clarify how to put a multiple frequency
> statement into proper form for AACR2.  The record I am working on is OCLC
> 1606055 for Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society.  It is a serial
> record and the 362 is in old format.  I know how to change to AACR2 format
> for one series of volumes, but this record includes a 2nd and 3rd series.
> In the original, each series is separated by a semi-colon.  I checked the
> Bibliographic Formats and Standards and the AACR2r manuals, but neither of
> them shows exactly this kind of series.
>
> Original: v.1-35 (no. 1-819) Jan. 1865-Jan.1903; 2d ser., v. 1-54, Sept.
> 1903-Apr. 1953; 3d ser., v. 1-   Mar. 1951-
>
> I would change it to the following:  Vol. 1 (Jan. 1865)-v. 35 (Jan. 1903)
> = no. 1-817 ; 2nd ser., vol. 1(Sept. 1903)-v. 54 (Apr. 1953 ; 3rd ser.,
> vol. 1 (Mar. 1951)-
>
> I have two specific questions.  Should there be a comma after the "ser." in
> each succeeding series? and how should the volume abbreviation be handled
> in each succeeding series?  "vol." "Vol." or "v."?
>
> Any help will be gratefully appreciated.
>
> TIA
>
> Dee Neff
> Serials Cat. Asst.
> J.B.Duke Library
> Furman University
> Greenville SC
> dee.neff@furman.edu

2)______

Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 12:29:05 -0500
From: Maija Cravens <mscravens@MAIL.SHSW.WISC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Correct 362 (Dee Neff)

The CONSER Editing Guide, in the section for 362, p. 3,
has an example pretty much like yours. It shows a comma
after ser. and volume is abbreviated to v.
Example: -Dec. 1980 ; new ser., v. 1, no. 1 (Jan. 1981)-

Hope this helps,
Best regards
Maija