Re: ScreenScan (2 messages)
Birdie MacLennan 15 Jul 1999 20:10 UTC
2 messages, 45 lines:
(1)---------------------------
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 08:27:12 -0600
From: Dana Belcher <dbelcher@MAILCLERK.ECOK.EDU>
Subject: ScreenScan -Reply
We looked at them, but decided they were a quick fix/short-term solution.
We ended up buying new digital mf reader/printers and were surprised by
the low cost. We now have 2 new ones and another on order. Let me know
if you want more info.
Dana Belcher, Periodicals/Acquisitions Librarian
East Central University
Linscheid Library
200 S. Stadium Drive
Ada, OK 74820
<dbelcher@MAILCLERK.ECOK.EDU>
>>> Jane Devine <DEJLG@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU> 07/14/99 02:06pm >>>
Hello Colleagues:
Has anyone used ScreenScan, a microfilm scanner that can be mounted on
most reader/printers in order to transform mf into digital images for
sending or storing. I haven't been able to find any reviews or
commentary about this product, only what they say about themselves. I
would appreciate any comments or opinions about how the product works, its
cost and its effectiveness.
My thanks in advance. Jane Devine
LaGuardia Community College Library
<DEJLG@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
(2)----------------------------
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:11:52 -0400
From: Barbara Imes <BIMES@LIB.URSINUS.EDU>
Subject: Re: ScreenScan
I too would be very interested in this information, as our reader
printers are getting very old.
Barbara Imes
Periodicals Department
Ursinus College
BIMES@URSINUS.EDU