2 messages

1)-----------------------
From:         SKWORJ@GBMS01.UWGB.EDU
Subject:      (MIT's) Technology Review

I emailed the publisher to ask for confirmation of the name change and
explained the ramifications for libraries.  Here is the response I
received:

> We apologize for the confusion our name has cause you and others in the
> periodicals.  We added "MIT's" as a descriptive element, but did not intend
> to cause a name change.  We are still, as before, Technology Review.
>
> Again, our apologies for this inconvenience.
>
> Ann Young

I think I shall not attempt to explain OCLC to them . . .

Jeanette Skwor
Cofrin Library
UW-Green Bay

2)-------------------
From:         dcvh@MIT.EDU
Subject:      Technology review (Cambridge, Mass. : 1998)
In-Reply-To:  Your message of "Fri, 01 May 1998 15:21:04 EDT."
              <9805011921.AA18301@MIT.EDU>

Greetings again --

Survey says, "It's a title change."

The record for the new title, beginning with the May/June 1998 issue,
can be found at: sn98-38116 (OCLC #39058693).

        David Van Hoy, Principal
           Serials Cataloger
             MIT Libraries
               dcvh@mit.
                  edu
                   =

>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 15:04:18 -0400
>From: Karrie_F._Yukon@GMRNOTES3.GMR.COM
>Subject: MIT Technology Review
>
>HI,
>This afternoon in the mail I received the latest issues of Technology
>Review, or MIT's Technology Review.  Does anyone know, or have heard of
>this changing it's name once again??  Does anyone have any thoughts about
>binding or re-cataloging.
>
>This does not really make me very happy, especially on a Friday.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Karrie Yukon
>Serials Librarian
>General Motors
>Warren, MI  48090