Re: OCLC Union List Users Group Renny Lloyd 28 Aug 1997 01:09 UTC

In a message dated 97-08-27 09:22:44 EDT,  RC Dowd
<dowd@ALDUS.NORTHNET.ORG> wrote:

<<
 Do people like the time slot at ALA, which is Mon. in the vicinity of
 10 to 11 AM?  It could be changed if there is a preferable time.  Does it
 conflict with anything important?  If it were changed, would that be
 better or worse?  Is there an 'absolutely not' time-slot?  Is there an
 'ideal' one? >>

If you go back and look at the programs for the last several years, you will
find an extremely crowded program on Sat & Sun.  I have _Never_ been able to
attend all the sessions I would like on those two days.  Mon, Tues, however,
are less hectic.  And for the same reason, when I _do_ go to a session on
those days, I am more relaxed and can focus better on the topic, rather than
be worried if I can make it to the next meeting.

To be honest, OCLC Union List Users Group is not a big priority on my
schedule.  When you are at a smaller institution where you wear many hats,
you must be involved in sessions more pertenint to your daily operations. On
the crowded Sat / Sun schedule, OCLC Union List Users Group would [probably]
be "bumped' on my schedule.

PLEASE ... this is not a putdown on the group.  It doesn't mean I don't think
it is important ... it is a matter of priority.

Actually, I like the 10-11, 11-12 , 1-2, 2-3 slots.
I can sleep in if I had a big night out :>), and not miss anything important.
 & I can have the afternoon free to perurse the exhibits.

In other words, I wouldn't change the time/day slot.  Seems ok where it is.

Anyway,  just my thoughts.

Renny Lloyd
<RennyLloyd@AOL.COM>