1997 RESEARCH AWARD LIBRARY ACQUISITIONS: PRACTICE & THEORY The Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory (LAPT) Research Award provides an annual prize of $1,000 for research in the broad areas of acquisitions, serials, publishing, and collection management. The award will be given for one proposal and administered in two parts: $500 when the proposal is selected to fund the research effort and $500 when the completed manuscript is submitted to Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory. The award will be granted to the individual, not the institution, and may be used to cover expenses incurred in conducting the research outlined in the winning proposal, including travel, postage, staff support, supplies, and other items. The winning proposal will identify a critical issue in acquisitions, serials, publishing, or collection management and outline a rigorous approach to testing or solving the issue raised. Proposals will be judged on their significance, clarity and originality. The proposal should be a brief, concise description of the project (no more than 500 words). A budget proposal and a one page vita of the author must be attached. Awards will not be limited to experienced researchers; however, researchers should present their proposal clearly addressing the following issues: 1. What are the aims and objectives of the research proposal? 2. What methodology and data analysis procedures will be employed? 3. What related research has been undertaken and/or published? Please include specific citations. 4. Is the research replication of a previous study? The deadline for submitting proposals is February 15, 1997. Proposals will be reviewed by a panel consisting of the editor-in-chief, the assistant editors, and three members of the editorial board. The winning proposal will be announced at the American Library Association Conference in 1997 and in the fourth issue of LAPT for the year. Research for the winning proposal must be completed within one year of the date when the award is announced. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory reserves the right of first refusal of the completed manuscript. Information on past recipients and their research follows: 1992 -- Anna H. Perrault -- "The Shrinking Collection: A Study of the Effects of the Diversion of Funds from Monographs to Serials on the Monograph Collections of Research Libraries" Published in LAPT v. 18, no. 1, pp. 3-22. This study investigated the shrinking non-serial resources base for United States academic libraries, shifts in monographic collecting patterns and trends in the acquisition of foreign language imprints, and the decline in monograph acquisitions as distributed across subject disciplines or among language groups. 1993 -- Samuel Demas, Anne S. Caputo, and William J. Kara -- "Viability of the Vendor Model of Information Delivery Through a Library Gateway" The study aims to determine the viability of the 'vendor model' of information delivery through a library gateway. By offering a campus community unrestricted access to an unprecedented scope of electronic information, libraries and vendors will learn for the first time: which files are used, how much they are used, by whom they are used (e.g. faculty, staff, students), and at what times of the day and night. 1994 -- Tina E. Chrzastowski and Karen A. Schmidt -- "The Serials Cancellation Crisis: Determining Recent National Trends in Academic Library Serial Collections Through the Use of Commercial Vendor Subscription Records" The study will determine how recent rounds of serial cancellations have affected academic research collections nationwide. It will identify national trends in serials collections by analyzing serial cancellations and serial orders over three year (1991-1993) from ten academic research libraries located throughout the United States. This study builds on the earlier work of the researchers, "Surveying the Damage: Academic Library Serial Cancellations 1987-88 through 1989-90," which appeared in College and Research Libraries, volume 54, no. 2 (March 1993, pp. 93-102. 1995 -- no award made 1996 -- Tschera Harkness Connell -- "Effects of Series Authority Control for Acquisitions" The study "grew out of the 1993 proposal from the Library of Congress to discontinue the series authority work. [A subsequent decision was made in Fall 1994 that LC would continue to provide added entries and series authorities.] This study will address such questions as to what extent (if any) will eliminating series authority control increase the potential for duplicates in the acquisition process? Specifically, the issue will be examined in the context of approval plans. Is it possible that the series control is monitored sufficiently by the vendors for purposes of preventing unwanted duplicates?" Proposals and questions concerning this year's award should be addressed to: Carol Pitts Diedrichs Editor-in-Chief Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory 2338 Antigua Drive #2C Columbus, OH 43235 (614) 292-6314 FAX: (614) 292-2015 Internet: diedrichs.1@osu.edu ************************************************************************** Carol Pitts Diedrichs Head, Acquisition Department Editor, Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Avenue Mall Columbus, OH, 43210-1286 tel: 614-292-6314 fax: 614-292-2015 Internet: diedrichs.1@osu.edu