Yvonne,

The 785 $t in #1519739 (60-44645) was incorrect. The record has been
revised.

Uniform title is not necessary for the current (1993- ) title because
it is unique.

        David Van Hoy, Principal
           Serials Cataloger
             MIT Libraries
               dcvh@mit.
                  edu
                   =

(MIT is a CONSER participant)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        ...

>Two questions.  Shouldn't the new title beginning in 1993 have a
>uniform title?  And should the date in that title be 1958? I'm going
>to have a heck of a time explaining to people why the uniform title
>has 1958 when the beginning date for the title is 1993.
>
>Any help will be appreciated.
>
>Yvonne Stroup
>Serials Cataloger
>Marriott Library
>University of Utah
>ystroup@alexandria.lib.utah.edu