Ed. note:  For additional discussions and perspectives on this
topic, one might also want check the SERIALST archives (re. shelving
arrangements (classified vs. alpha, etc.)).  Though more discussion is
always welcome, this has come up a number of times in the past.  -bml

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
I have worked in libraries with either classified or alphabetical serials.
I prefer alphabetical arrangement, because I think it is much easier for
students.  It used to drive me crazy watching students having to look up the
call number for each periodical.  I think it just forces them to one more
step in an already long and confusing process of finding articles.  We have
lists of our serials available that clearly state the former and later
titles under each title.  Our students seem to cope.  I do think that our
students come primarily with citations to specific articles and are not
examining complete runs.

Hope this helps.

Patricia Thompson wrote:
>what are the arguments for and against a classified
>arrangement vs. alpha by title?

>In a collection arranged by title,
>is it common practice to put "dummies" in the shelves linking former and
>later titles?

Anne Frohlich, Serials Librarian     PHONE 318/475-5741
Frazar Memorial Library                FAX 318/475-5719
McNeese State University             EMAIL frohlich@acc.mcneese.edu
Box 91445
Lake Charles, LA 70609