Re: New vs. reconditioned microfilm machines (Tim Lawrence) Ann Ercelawn 11 Apr 1996 17:00 UTC

Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 12:36:25 -0400
From: Tim Lawrence <lawrencet@NKU.EDU>
Subject: Re: New vs. reconditioned microfilm machines (Steve Black)

I have no experience with reconditioned reader/printer's, but when
I was still a student I worked in the our Periodicals department for over
a year, and this included working with both 500 and 600 series  Minolta
RP's. The 600 series RP's are in my view *less* reliable then the older
machines, because they have more bells and whistles that can and do
malfunction. I would hardly consider the newer machine to be worth an extra
$4,500.

Tim Lawrence                            lawrencet@nku.edu
Serials Assistant
Northern Kentucky University
Steely Library

> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 09:00:43 -0700
> From: Steve Black <blacks@ROSNET.STROSE.EDU>
> Subject: New vs. reconditioned microfilm machines
>
> Our library needs to choose between a new Minolta RP603Z Reader/Printer
> for about $7000 or a reconditioned Minolta RP505 for $2500.  We now have
> the RP505 on a rental basis, and it seems to work well.
>   Would we be making a mistake by getting the older model?  Can anyone
> give me their experience with the reliability and longevity of the
> Minolta 505?
>
> Thank you,
> Steve Black
> blacks@rosnet.strose.edu
>