On Thu, 25 May 1995 09:37:03 EST William Hoffman said:
>RE: Revue de Belles-Lettres (RBL)

OUR RECORDS DO NOT EXACTLY AGREE WITH SWETS.  IN OUR MIND, THEY JUST
SKIPPED ANNEE 117.  OUR INFORMATION APPEARS IN ALL CAPS NEXT TO THE
INFO FROM SWETS.   SUSAN DAVIS, UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO

>According to our records, this is what we have received of RBL:
>
>- 93 116e annee no.  1                 ANNEE 116E NO.1 (1993)
>- 93 116e annee nos. 2-4 (combined)    ANNEE [116E] NO.2/4 (1993)
>- 94 117e annee nos. 1-2 (combined)    (ISSUE SAID 117, BUT WE ASSUMED
>- 94 117e annee nos. 3-4 (combined)       IT SHOULD BE 116)
>- 95 118e annee no.  1                 ANNEE 118E NO.1/2 (1994)
                                        ANNEE 118E NO.3/4 (1994)
                                        ANNEE 1193 NO.1 (19950
                                      (LOOKS LIKE THE SOCIETY JUST LOST
                                          TRACK OF THEIR NUMBERING)