Summary - "Duplicate Year End Issues" (Sonya Foust)
Marcia Tuttle 04 Jan 1995 15:03 UTC
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 1995 09:25:41 -0400
From: Sonya Foust <FOUST%DAYTON.bitnet@uvmvm.uvm.edu>
Subject: Summary - "Duplicate Year End Issues"
Thanks for all who responded...nice to know we have lots of company with
this problem. Did not hear from any agents or publishers so will list the
responses from libraries as to why they feel the problem exists!
1)publishers/fulfillment centers/vendors hire "temporary" staff
to process the large rush of orders in the fall. Many orders
that are "renewals" are processed as "new" orders.
2)Different address variations are used by those involved in
the process. One libraries name was too long to fit on one
line so everyone shortened it in their own way!
3)Fulfillment houses immediately begin a "new" subscription
but if you check mailing label expire it is correct. One
person suggested that monthly quotas for new subscriptions
are "padded" in this manner.
4)Library has changed its name or address.
Possible "helps" for the problem....(don't know of a solution!!!)
1)Send duplicate labels immediately to agents so they can send
them on to publisher/fulfillment houses.
2)Library should immediately call publisher direct and tell them
the problem. Have the labels handy so you can read any info
to them. Money spent on long distance calls is offset by less
time spent on staff labor.
3)Send all renewals rec'd from publishers to agent before renewal
is generated. Agent can then use subscriber number on invoice.
(doesn't always work because renewals are done before publisher
begins to send out renewals)
4)If known, add member numbers or account numbers to renewal list
sent to agents.
5)Get publishers to provide a unique identifier for each
subscription regardless of which agency was handling the
subcription, so when you change vendors the subscription
number would be transferred. This would also help in
claiming and eliminate the need to send proofs of payment..
again you would use the unique number for all correspondence.
Perhaps some of you were on break for the holidays and did not
get to put "your" two cents to this discussion...please add
any comments....many are just frustrated at this time of year
with all the waste of time and material trying to straighten
out this problem! Hope this gives you some food for thought!
Happy New Year!
Sonya Foust, University of Dayton, Roesch Library, Periodicals