Date: Fri, 02 Dec 1994 14:09:42 -0800
From: Mitch Turitz <TURITZ@MERCURY.SFSU.EDU>
Subject: RE: ISSN for Science Communication (Gail Donlon)

Gail:
  I don't know this for certain, as I am not looking at the title in
question, but it sounds like the publisher just did not put the new ISSN on
the new title and was not aware that new titles require new ISSNs.  This is
a common mistake of publishers.  If the OCLC or RLIN record has the old
ISSN in the $z of the 022 then you know that it IS mistake by the
publisher.

-- Mitch

>Date: Fri, 02 Dec 1994 12:07:16 -0800 (PST)
>From: Gail Donlon <donlon@RAND.ORG>
>Subject: Science Communication
>
>Does anyone have information re: the ISSN of Science Communication
>(continues Knowledge)?  L.C. & RLIN list the ISSN as 1075-5470, but
>the issue in hand shows an ISSN of 0164-0259 (same as Knowledge, the
>title it continues).
  _^_                                                 _^_
( ___ )-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-( ___ )
 |   |                                               |   |
 |   |     Mitch Turitz, Serials Librarian           |   |
 |   |     San Francisco State University Library    |   |
 |   |     Internet: turitz@sfsu.edu                 |   |
 |   |                                               |   |
( ___ )-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-==-( ___ )
   V                                                   V
       Rule #1: Don't sweat the small stuff.
       Rule #2: It's ALL small stuff.