*** Resending note of 04/11/91 01:08
Received: from UVMVM.BITNET by vtvm1.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 Beta) with BSMTP
id 2164; Thu, 11 Apr 91 01:08:20 EDT Received: by UVMVM (Mailer R2.07) id
3600; Wed, 10 Apr 91 19:00:10 EST Date: Wed, 10 Apr 91 17:53:00 CST Reply-To:
"SERIALST: SERIALS in libraries - A user discussion group"
<SERIALST@UVMVM.BITNET> Sender: "SERIALST: SERIALS in libraries
- A user discussion group"
<SERIALST@UVMVM.BITNET> From: Caitlin Robinson 5-9049
<CADCAITS@UIAMVS.BITNET> Subject: ANSI Holdings To: Charles Litchfield
<BUDDYL@VTVM1.BITNET>,
Gail McMillan <GMCMILLA@VTVM1.BITNET>,
"MISSYO@VTVM1 Melissa Wilson Obenhaus" <MISSYO@VTVM1.BITNET>,
Robert Pillow <PILLOW@VTVM1.BITNET>,
Marilyn Norstedt <SWEDE@VTVM1.BITNET>
This is a real nitty gritty question related to application of the draft ANSI
Format for Non-Serial Holdings...a warning to those faint of heart.
We are using this draft standard in our online holdings records for
continuations (as opposed to serials) Examples include looseleaf services,
treatises with supplementation, etc.
We recently received a volume containing two "non-contiguous" code titles,
e.g., Title 10 and Title 13. We know that two bibl. units bound in a single
physical unit is recorded Title 10/13 and that a run of titles (or volumes)
each in a single physical unit are recorded Title 10-13 (compressed) BUT WHAT
DO WE DO WITH THIS? The standard does not provide direct guidance, unless I am
missing it. We have elected to record the volume in this manner but would
welcome any better suggestions:
Title 1-9 Title 10 13 Title 14-22
Thanks, and don't ask why we are applying this draft standard, its a long
story.
Caitlin Robinson, Head Technical Services and Automated Systems, University of
Iowa Law Library.
We would add Title 10 and Title 13 on separate lines (two 863s or two 866s).
Either way, each line would get a $z 'bound with' note.
Gail McMillan (gmcmilla@VTVM1)
Serials Cataloging, University Libraries
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University