At VPI&SU we are using the computer files format to catalog serials on CD-ROMs
 (as well as serials on magnetic tape. We're planning on using it for
 electronically-received-journals also.) Though our online system, VTLS, does
 not yet index 538/753 fields nor the unique computer files format fixed
 fields, this info may be accessible and useful someday. Personally, I prefer
 the serials format with its 780/785 links, other 7XX linking fields and 525
 and 550 notes. To me the serials format has more useful info than the computer
 files format.

 We are going through the same steps at OCLC (and VTLS) no matter what format
 we're cataloging, including entering original records. I'm sure we don't have
 much more experience in this area that anyone else but someone has to do it!

 I've noticed that NSD is cataloging electronic journals using the serials
 format rather than the computer files format. Does anyone know why?

 CDs also get LC call numbers; VTLS allows call number browsing. Both the bib
 and the holdings records inform VTLS users where the CDs are available.

 What subject subdivisions are catalogers using for serials on CDs? $x
 Periodicals?

 MARC holdings records for serials on CD-ROMs are coded the same way as other
 serials, i.e., dates of coverage (ERIC) or dates of issue (BIP+), whichever is
 most appropriate. We do not barcode CDs or any other periodicals.

 Most CDs are available to the public in our Electronic Reference Area (ERA) at
 dedicated p.c.s with individual CD-ROM players or networked through an
 in-house network allowing up to 6 simultaneous users access to 16 CD-ROMs.
 InfoTrac and others have their own workstations.

 What about electronic journals? We are not anticipating anything really
 different in terms of processing (cataloging, holdings, call numbers, subject
 tracings, etc.) but training up-front (receiving) and end-users (reference) is
 a concern.

 Gail McMillan Serials Cataloging Team Leader VPI&SU (703)231-9252