question about digital serials access
Fastmail
(23 Aug 2017 14:58 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Julianne Newberry
(23 Aug 2017 15:19 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Pennington, Buddy D.
(23 Aug 2017 15:29 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Leslie Burke
(23 Aug 2017 15:24 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Melissa Belvadi
(23 Aug 2017 15:29 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Rodriguez, Michael
(23 Aug 2017 16:32 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Fastmail
(24 Aug 2017 01:35 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Cynthia Harper
(24 Aug 2017 12:56 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Leslie Burke
(24 Aug 2017 13:03 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
MSaunders@GALLERY.CA
(24 Aug 2017 13:10 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Leslie Burke
(24 Aug 2017 13:12 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
MSaunders@GALLERY.CA
(24 Aug 2017 13:15 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Bell, W Michael
(24 Aug 2017 13:21 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Judith Koveleskie
(24 Aug 2017 13:30 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
MSaunders@GALLERY.CA
(24 Aug 2017 13:59 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Williams, Ginger
(24 Aug 2017 14:31 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access David P. Dillard (24 Aug 2017 15:32 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Fastmail
(24 Aug 2017 16:15 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Elena Koustova
(24 Aug 2017 14:37 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
MSaunders@GALLERY.CA
(24 Aug 2017 14:55 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
LeAnne Rumler
(24 Aug 2017 15:06 UTC)
|
Re: *EXT* Re: [SERIALST] question about digital serials access
Frances K Rosen
(24 Aug 2017 14:02 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Beth M. Johns
(24 Aug 2017 14:58 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Herraghty, Maureen
(24 Aug 2017 17:47 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Diane Westerfield
(24 Aug 2017 15:05 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Herraghty, Maureen
(23 Aug 2017 16:55 UTC)
|
Re: question about digital serials access
Angela Galvan
(24 Aug 2017 17:53 UTC)
|
This may be of help in this regard FAIR USE UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW https://sites.google.com/site/fairuseundercopyrightlaw/ Sincerely, David Dillard Temple University (215) 204 - 4584 jwne@temple.edu On Thu, 24 Aug 2017, Williams, Ginger wrote: > > No. I highly recommend that you read up on fair use. It’s governed by Section 107 of the Copyright > Act, which is designed to protect the rights of copyright holders (i.e., authors and the publishers > to whom they’ve assigned rights). Saying “fair use” does not give you a free pass to violate > contracts. Instead, you should be arguing to include a fair use clause in your contracts; however, > even a fair use clause only provides limited rights. More information on fair use is available at > https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html. Please do some reading. > > > > Ginger > > > > Virginia Kay Williams > > Head Acquisitions Librarian > > Texas State University > > (512)245-3009 > > Vkw11@txstate.edu > > > > > > > > From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of > MSaunders@GALLERY.CA > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 8:59 AM > To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG > Subject: Re: [SERIALST] question about digital serials access > > > > These agreements were set up by these companies to protect their profits. If someone uses a resource > and no one is profiting from it besides the publisher, wouldn’t that be considered fair use? > > > > From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Judith > Koveleskie > Sent: August-24-17 9:31 AM > To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG > Subject: Re: [SERIALST] question about digital serials access > > > > Yes. Absolutely wrong. > > > Judith A. Koveleskie, Serials Librarian > Seton Hill University, Reeves Memorial Library > 1 Seton Hill Drive, Greensburg, PA 15601-1548 > 724-838-7828 > This document may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the > addressee. If you received it in error, please contact the sender at once and destroy the document. > The document may contain information subject to restrictions of the Family Educational Rights and > Privacy and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Acts. Such information may not be disclosed or used in any fashion > outside the scope of the service for which you are receiving the information. > > > > [uc?export=download&id=0B5sUK8L5L3h8cWpqaW1nYXdFUHc&revid=0B5sUK8L5L3h8SlNQRzJjK1ZubGFPS2phV215Wk0rR > EtxU21jPQ] > > > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Bell, W Michael <Mike-Bell@utc.edu> wrote: > > Ethics aside, if you sign a contract you are legally obligated to abide by the agreement. Ignoring > laws or rules you don’t like is more than merely unethical, it’s wrong. > > > > > > From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of > MSaunders@GALLERY.CA > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:16 AM > To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG > Subject: Re: [SERIALST] question about digital serials access > > > > Are these publishers really being ethical. Or are they taking advantage? > > > > From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Leslie > Burke > Sent: August-24-17 9:13 AM > To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG > Subject: Re: [SERIALST] question about digital serials access > > > > Ethics? > > > > Leslie D. Burke > > Collection Development & Digital Integration Librarian, Library > > Kalamazoo College > > 1200 Academy St > > Kalamazoo, MI 49006 > > p 269.337.7144 > > f 269.337.7395 > > Leslie.Burke@kzoo.edu > > More in Four. More in a Lifetime. > > No one has to do everything, but everyone has to do something – What’s your Green Dot? > > LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/leslieburke/ > > Twitter: librarygal2go; K’s Library on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/kalamazoocollegelibrary > > > > From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of > MSaunders@GALLERY.CA > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:10 AM > To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG > Subject: Re: [SERIALST] question about digital serials access > > > > So, what if you break the rules? Give people access. If it isn’t greatly increasing your user > statistics, who’s going to know? Do you think the license police are going to show up? – just saying… > > > > From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Leslie > Burke > Sent: August-24-17 9:04 AM > To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG > Subject: Re: [SERIALST] question about digital serials access > > > > I believe ours is set up that true walk-in guests have access to our resources on guest computers, so > they can’t get to institutional things other than public ones. If they are affiliated enough to get a > campus ID, then perhaps that would be what qualifies them as an “authorized user” under the terms of > the license. I think users can use our free/guest wi-fi which would put them in our IP range, but > they wouldn’t be connected to the campus network. The IP authentication however, would presumably > still put them in access to our resources, I think, as walk-ins. > > > > Leslie D. Burke > > Collection Development & Digital Integration Librarian, Library > > Kalamazoo College > > 1200 Academy St > > Kalamazoo, MI 49006 > > p 269.337.7144 > > f 269.337.7395 > > Leslie.Burke@kzoo.edu > > More in Four. More in a Lifetime. > > No one has to do everything, but everyone has to do something – What’s your Green Dot? > > LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/leslieburke/ > > Twitter: librarygal2go; K’s Library on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/kalamazoocollegelibrary > > > > From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Cynthia > Harper > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 8:57 AM > To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG > Subject: Re: [SERIALST] question about digital serials access > > > > So do others here see a problem with allowing access via the campus network on the campus IP > addresses to walk-ins? Or is it typical for the campus network to be unavailable to walk-in users? > Is the issue whether licenses permit walk-ins, but define them as only on campus computers? > > > > Cindy > > > > From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of > Fastmail > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:35 PM > To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG > Subject: Re: [SERIALST] question about digital serials access > > > > Dear Michael, > > Thank you for your specific and detailed reply! This is enormously helpful. Do you think that a very > large university like Yale could offer a limited number of visitor cards, them call those users > “university affiliates” and allow them to access eresources from their own computers? My primary > interest is coming up with a realistic proposal (for a school project) that might eliminate the > inefficiency created by requiring that visiting scholar bring their own laptops and use eduRoam to > get a computer anywhere near special collections or comfortable seating, but then requiring that they > log in to a “home” library account to add money to that account in order to use a scanner or copier > (which is, of course, very expensive). Heaven forbid they want to print anything—that would require > using a separate computer belonging to the library. My understanding is that archives and special > collections the world over end up with people taking photographs with digital cameras, and when > that’s an easier solution, something is very wrong. > > > > I hope that makes some sense; librarians end up losing a lot of time to explaining an unnecessarily > difficult process, when you add it all up over the course of a year. As you say, the number of users > who visit is not large, compared to the total (students + faculty), and as long as they are have come > all the way to Yale to access its vast collections, it seems to me that there ought to be some way to > offer access to the ridiculous digital resources as well, especially given that Sterling Library is > moving towards an all-digital journal collection. I would limit this to users who are on campus, but > I do dream of allowing them to use their own computers. Do you think that’s at all realistic? Again, > I am sorry if this is obvious, but I have just begun my education. > > > > Thanks again, > > Anne-Marie > > > Anne-Marie Lindsey > > Library Science and Information Management > > iSchool at Syracuse University > > > On Aug 23, 2017, 12:34 PM -0400, Rodriguez, Michael <michael.a.rodriguez@UCONN.EDU>, wrote: > > Hi Lindsey, > > > > Once contractually permitted, alumni access privileges to eresources are easy to > configure in EZproxy as long as the alumni category is clearly defined and consistently > used in your university’s identity management system (typically CAS and/or LDAP). What > our EZproxy service does at UConn, is query CAS to confirm that the user’s NetID is valid > and then query LDAP to make sure that the NetID does not match one of the prohibited > categories. We maintain separate LDAP categories for affiliated users and for alumni. We > have a resource block in our Ezproxy configuration that prohibits affiliated user access > to specific eresources. One of my long-term projects is to identify eresources whose > licenses already permit alumni access (e.g., Project Muse) and then configure EZproxy to > allow alumni access specifically to those eresources, which, again, EZproxy can do easily > given a good university infrastructure. > > > > Regarding licensing that permits affiliate and alumni, the LIBLICENSE Model License has > excellent language specifically authorizing access by visiting scholars and independent > contractors, as well as a nice flexible clause authorizing “any valid ID-holders,” which > could be readily interpreted as meaning anyone with valid university credentials. But > most vendors are very wary of extending access to alumni—understandably so—and you’d > probably get legal pushback and/or price increases from most vendors if you attempted to > interpret a license so as to extend alumni access. However, most of UConn’s eresource > licenses explicitly permit access for “university affiliates,” who after all constitute a > tiny, tiny fraction of our total FTE. > > > > At my prevous organization, alumni access to eresources was funded out of the Alumni > Association’s budget. > > > > That may be garbled, but I hope it helps! > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael Rodriguez > > Licensing/Acquisitions Librarian > > University of Connecticut > > 369 Fairfield Way U-1005B | Storrs, CT 06269 > > michael.a.rodriguez@uconn.edu | 860-486-9325 > > > > From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On > Behalf Of Melissa Belvadi > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 11:30 AM > To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG > Subject: Re: [SERIALST] question about digital serials access > > > > Start reading license agreements. Most explicitly deny this, some charge extra for it > (whose budget would that come out of). It's not a technical/logistical issue, but a > contractual one, and you have to analyze contract by contract AND then figure out how to > provide that remote access to only the ones that are allowed and not the rest. We tried > this once and ended up setting up a second ezproxy server to handle it. The project > basically failed because the alumns who wanted access didn't want what we could provide > but just the more expensive journals whose vendors would not allow alum access at all. > > > > Melissa > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Fastmail <amlindsey@fastmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I am in my first term at the iSchool at Syracuse, so do forgive me if this question > is naïve. I would like to know if it is possible to give unaffiliated users access > to electronic serials at a very large academic library? > > > > I want to research the practicalities of implementing, for unaffiliated users such as > visiting scholars, a system similar to the alumni library cards universities like > Columbia and Yale have in place. I am an alumna of Barnard College, so I have friends > with Columbia library cards, and I live in New Haven with friends who work at Yale > Libraries, so I am also aware of Yale’s policies. Would it be possible to offer a paid > library card system for unaffiliated users that would also offer access to electronic > journals? Perhaps a limited number of these, to assure only a specific and measurable > increase in users to subscription serials? I am thinking specifically of a university > like Yale, where these cards and their users would constitute a very small number, > compared to the total number of users. My professor fears that vendors would not consider > this idea to be at all appealing, and would reject it out of hand. She suggested that I > contact members of this list, as you are the experts! > > > > Any ideas or suggestions would be incredibly helpful! I am at a stage in my research > where I can be very flexible, so please send anything and everything my way. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Anne-Marie > > > Anne-Marie Lindsey > > Library Science and Information Management > > iSchool at Syracuse University > > > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > > > > -- > > Melissa Belvadi > > Collections Librarian > > University of Prince Edward Island > > mbelvadi@upei.ca 902-566-0581 > > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link: > http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1 > > > ############################ To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list: write to: mailto:SERIALST-SIGNOFF-REQUEST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG or click the following link: http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1