When to input a new serial record HALDY, AMANDA E GS-11 USAF AETC AUL/LTSC (04 Apr 2014 15:22 UTC)
Re: When to input a new serial record Mike Saunders (04 Apr 2014 15:55 UTC)
Re: When to input a new serial record HALDY, AMANDA E GS-11 USAF AETC AUL/LTSC (04 Apr 2014 17:54 UTC)
Re: When to input a new serial record Kevin M Randall (04 Apr 2014 16:36 UTC)
Re: When to input a new serial record Mike Saunders (04 Apr 2014 17:59 UTC)

Re: When to input a new serial record Mike Saunders 04 Apr 2014 17:59 UTC

The point is, it's not a different serial. It's the same serial with a different name. What if it changes names again next issue which is entirely possible. The serials cataloguer must create another new record for the same serial and the end user now has to sift through 3, 4, 5 records to find the issues they are looking for. It is ridiculous, not helpful, and not logical

Mike Saunders,

-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
Sent: April-04-14 12:36 PM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] When to input a new serial record

Changes in serial titles are treated the same way in RDA as they were in AACR2.  Major changes are listed in RDA 2.3.2.13.1, and minor changes in RDA 2.3.2.13.2.  This particular situation is considered to be a major change in 2.3.2.13.1(c), which is:  "a change of name for a corporate body included anywhere in the title if the changed name is for a different corporate body."  In the descriptive cataloging rules (both AACR2 and RDA), when a corporate body changes its name it then becomes a different corporate body.  Likewise, when a serial has a major change in title, it becomes a different serial.  The relationships between the earlier and later names, and between the earlier and later works/expressions, tie the entities together for the user.

Kevin M. Randall
Principal Serials Cataloger
Northwestern University Library
kmr@northwestern.edu
(847) 491-2939

Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
> [mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of HALDY, AMANDA E GS-11 USAF
> AETC AUL/LTSC
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 10:23 AM
> To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
> Subject: [SERIALST] When to input a new serial record
>
> This question concerns the Journal of Diplomacy and International
> Relations published by Seton Hall University--though I have run into
> similar situations before. See (OCoLC)ocm60491430 for this specific
> record.
>
> The title used to be The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and
> International Relations (as in the above record), but when The
> Whitehead School of Diplomacy & International Relations (issuing body)
> dropped "Whitehead" from their title and became simply the School of
> Diplomacy & International Relations, the School opted to put the
> university name in the title instead--our most recently received issue
> is now Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations.
>
> Does this really constitute a title change? I'm hoping someone can
> explain the subtleties to me. Current practice certainly seems to
> reinforce that, yes, this kind of change warrants the creation of a
> new record in the catalog, superseding the old title. Indeed, a 780
> field linking the new Seton Hall Journal to the old Whitehead Journal
> now exists in the OCLC record.
>
> The source of my confusion, however, lies within OCLC's own guidelines
> for when to input a new record. Accordingly, the guidelines for
> serials state that an "addition, deletion or rearrangement of the name
> of the issuing body anywhere in the title" should not be considered a
> change in the title proper. Furthermore, "If the only difference is a
> change in the place of publication [or] publisher..." do not create a new record.
>
> Perhaps the logic for creating a new record in this situation (instead
> of merely providing an additional access point in the existing record)
> relies on the idea that both of the above situations, which on their
> own are not valid motivation, together are sufficient.
>
> I'd appreciate any opinions on the matter to help me navigate these
> situations in the future. At the heart of the issue is a philosophical
> question about our motives for creating new records, especially in
> this digital age of extensible, FRBRized data that should have long
> outgrown the catalog card, and what manner of organizing the
> descriptions of our resources best serves patrons. But I don't expect
> that to be answered anytime soon!
>
> Thank you,
>
> //SIGNED//
> Amanda Haldy
> Catalog Librarian
> Muir S. Fairchild Research Information Center
> DSN 493-2135   Comm (334) 953-2190
>
>
> ***********************************************
> * You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries
> discussion
> forum)
> * To post a message to the list address: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
> * For additional information, see  the SERIALST Scope, Purpose and
> Usage Guidelines <http://www.uvm.edu/~bmaclenn/serialst.html>
> ***********************************************

***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries discussion forum)
* To post a message to the list address: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
* For additional information, see  the SERIALST Scope, Purpose and Usage Guidelines <http://www.uvm.edu/~bmaclenn/serialst.html>
***********************************************

***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries discussion forum)
* To post a message to the list address: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
* For additional information, see  the SERIALST Scope, Purpose and Usage Guidelines <http://www.uvm.edu/~bmaclenn/serialst.html>
***********************************************