Re: Serials Solutions vs. SFX
Linda Wobbe 29 Mar 2010 17:30 UTC
Our Periodicals Manager recently noticed the same thing.
And we use SerialsSolutions. They also represent JSTOR
holdings as closed holdings that they add to each year,
eventually. I think JSTOR might be the source of the
problem. We should complain to them, perhaps.
Linda Wobbe
Head, Collection Management
Saint Mary's College of California
1928 Saint Mary's Road; PO Box 4290
Moraga, CA 94575-4290
(925) 631-4232; (925) 631-4229
(925) 376-6097 fax
LWobbe@stmarys-ca.edu
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:42:08 -0500
"Platkowski, Melissa" <platkowm@UWGB.EDU> wrote:
> I don't know about this, but it drives me crazy that Ex
>Libris doesn't just use a moving wall for titles in
>JStor. That would make so much more sense! Then they'd
>only have to change them when the wall moves, instead of
>every year.
>
> Melissa Platkowski
>
> Electronic Resources Librarian
> David A. Cofrin Library
> University of Wisconsin-Green Bay
> 2420 Nicolet Dr.
> Green Bay, WI 54311-7001
> P: (920) 465-2764
>F: (920) 465-2136
>
> platkowm@uwgb.edu
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
>[mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Mark
>Hemhauser
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 10:26 AM
> To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
> Subject: [SERIALST] Serials Solutions vs. SFX
>
> We use SFX from Ex Libris as our link resolver. I am
>wondering how
> Serials Solutions handles the JSTOR packages. SFX shows
>the beginning
> and ending years--1911-2006, for example. Every year,
>unknown when, Ex
> Libris will update the latest year so the threshold
>would read
> 1911-2007. It's the end of March and any title I check
>seems to have the
> newly added year at JSTOR, but SFX is behind. How much
>more current is
> Serials Solutions with the JSTOR collections?
>
>
> Mark
>
>
> --
> Mark Hemhauser
> Coordinator, Continuing and Electronic Resources
> McKeldin Library
> University of Maryland
> College Park, MD 20742
>
> 301-405-9309 (voice)
> 301-314-1200 (fax)