Re: LARS v. Able Software
Nancey Ryder-Cunningham 14 Aug 2009 15:46 UTC
We also were told by HF that LARS is no longer being used, and converted to
ABLE several years ago. We are quite happy with ABLE.
-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
[mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Debbie Turner
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 11:26 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] LARS v. Able Software
Dear Amy,
Our bindery told us that LARS bindery software is no longer being updated by
the manufacturer and required us to change to ABLE. We have been using ABLE
for 5 years and are very satisfied with it.
Debbie
Debbie Turner
Acquisitions Department Binding Unit
University Libraries
Northern IL University
DeKalb, IL 60115
815-753-9874
debturner@niu.edu
>>> Amy Shirk <Ashirk@ND.EDU> 8/13/2009 9:55 AM >>>
All,
I haven't seen this addressed recently - does anyone know the fate of LARS
bindery software? Although our bindery vendor suggested we transfer to the
Able software program, we have been using LARS for years without problem
and would prefer to stick with it. Of course, if it has a limited future
than we probably won't have a choice in the matter. I would appreciate your
input...
Amy Shirk
2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
Amy Shirk
Electronic Resources Assistant
Kresge Law
Library
University of Notre
Dame Have
a love affair with the wonder and beauty of the earth.
Technical
Services
(574)631-8113
-- Stewart Udall
ashirk@nd.edu
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111