Some results from The Survey of Academic & Research Library Journal Purchasing Practices James Moses 12 Nov 2008 15:27 UTC

Primary Research Group has published:  The Survey of Academic & Research
Library Journal Purchasing Practices (ISBN: 1-57440-108-4).  The study
presents data about the journals acquisitions and management practices of an
international sample of academic and research libraries.  The study reports on
a broad range of issues, including: spending trends, use of print vs. electronic
access, purchases in “bundles”, purchases through consortia, the role of
subscription agents, use and plans for use of open access, attitudes towards
the pricing practices of a range of major journal publishers, sources of funding
for journal purchases and relations with academic and administrative
departments of library parent organizations, and the practical management of
the journal acquisition process, among other issues.

Just a few of the report’s many findings are that:

•	The libraries in the sample acquired a mean of more than 46% of
their journal subscriptions in bundles of more then 50 titles.

•	The libraries in sample canceled a mean of 53 journal titles in the
past year.

•	Mean spending on print edition only subscriptions was $130,721, less
than a sixth of total spending.

•	About a quarter of the libraries in the sample believe that open
access has already slowed the increase in journal prices.

•	15.56% of the libraries in the sample have paid a publication fee on
behalf of an author from their institution.

•	For 42.22% of the libraries in the sample, all new subscriptions to
journals include electronic access.

•	More than 64% of the libraries in the sample keep track of their
various journal subscriptions through use of a commercial software product.

•	In general, subscription agents seem to enjoy a relatively high level
of customer satisfaction.  On the issue of timeliness of service, none of the
libraries in the sample said that they were highly dissatisfied with their
subscription agent and only 2.22% said that they were dissatisfied.

•	Non-academic research libraries have done more than their academic
counterparts to make sure that contracts renew at the same time. Smaller
institutions, those with journal budgets of less than $100,000 per year, were
less likely to make such efforts than libraries with higher budgets.

For further information view our website at www.PrimaryResearch.com.