I'm curious.  What was number one?

I would also be interested to hear the feedback from this thread.

Barbara.

barbara rauch,  acquisitions coordinator
mail no. b-30,   AUT university library
private bag 92006,
auckland 1142,
new zealand

ph: +64 (09) 921 9999 ex 8874  fax: + 64 (09) 921 9977

>>> On 20/11/08 at 8:17 a.m., "Hoyte, Daniel" <hoyte@CHAPMAN.EDU>
wrote:
We do not use Gold Rush, but it is a very good system. It was our
number two choice. The only thing that it was missing that we required
was MARC record export. It is possible to export data as n XML stream,
but we were not in a position to dedicate staff time to come up with an
XML to MARC converter.

Daniel Hoyte
Senior Systems Technician
Chapman University Leatherby Libraries
(714) 532-7745
hoyte@chapman.edu
AIM/Yahoo IM: chaphoyte

/(bb|[^b]{2})/ that is the Question

-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
[mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Dietsch.Barbara@EPA.GOV
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 11:48 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [SERIALST] Gold Rush

Is anybody using Gold Rush as their ERMS?  If so, can you tell us
about
it?  Pros and Cons.

Thanks!

Barb

barb dietsch | serials coordinator
epa library | unc contract staff
109 alexander drive | mail code c267-01
research triangle park, nc 27711
phone: 919.541.0726
fax: 919.541.1405
dietsch.barbara@epa.gov

><(((*>.··..··..··..··.<*)))><