Re: Sports Illustrated policy Ian Woodward 07 Mar 2007 13:53 UTC

Esquire quit publishing depictions of the Vargas girl some time ago.
The women's mags are scandalous not merely in their illustrations.

One ought to be skeptical that a commercial publisher would refuse to
trade in smut to which their market niche was habituated, as it has been
a slouch to the bottom in this culture for about fifty or sixty years
now.    I suspect the original poster talked to a rogue employee who was
making a mendacious excuse for inept inventory control and dodgy
business practices.  IW

I.  Woodward

Serials Office

Colgate University Libraries

Case Library and Geyer Center for Information Technology

13 Oak Drive

Hamilton, N.Y. 13346

Ph.:   315-228-7306

Fax:   315-228-7029

-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
[mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of Barbara Pope
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 4:03 PM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] Sports Illustrated policy

So, what about Esquire? Or Vogue?  Or Glamour? Or any magazine where

there is occassionally a person in a scanty outfit?  Why not them?

Barbara Pope, MALS

Reference/Periodicals Librarian

Axe Librarian

Pittsburg State University

Pittsburg KS  66762