Standard practices re: vol. numbers for combined issues or skipped issues?
Mari Keefe 05 Mar 2007 17:21 UTC
Hello all-
I hope this is not a repeat request and that it is an appropriate
request. I did try to search the archives.
This is an area outside my expertise.
I have been asked to find out if there are standard practices for
numbering volumes that serials engage in in when issues are combined or
skipped.
Right now we include a Vol. number , with No. X," where X corresponds to
the week of the year.
We'll be producing one combined issue this year, so we will effectively be
skipping an issue. Is it standard practice to *not* skip a number, even
though we're skipping an issue? How do other magazines that do double
issues during the year treat this?
Thank you,
Mari
Mari Keefe
Research Manager
Computerworld
mari_keefe@computerworld.com
Know an IT Leader? Is there someone you’d like to recommend for next
year’s Premier 100 IT Leaders list? Nominate that person today at
http://www.computerworld.com/p100nominations08
****
Computerworld is seeking nominations for truly new and innovative
corporate or consumer technologies for our third annual Horizon Awards.
Click for more information:
http://survey.computerworld.com/surveys/horizon07/horizon07.htm
****
Computerworld is seeking to identify 40 innovative technology people to
watch, under the age of 40. Nominations information here:
http://survey.computerworld.com/surveys/40under40/40under40.htm
****
Want to be notified about next year's Best Places to Work in IT program?
Email me at mari_keefe@computerworld.com
I'll put you on my alerts list!
****
Find information about all Computerworld's Editorial Research Projects and
Awards at http://www.computerworld.com/html/research