I agree with Carol.  It makes it easier for both students and staff when
the holdings are shelved by their titles, whether they are complete
volumes or not.  Binding different titles together necessitates public
notes in your catalog that users may or may not even look at when
chasing down titles from citations.

We typically have labels on our shelves indicating title changes so
someone at the beginning of your PHYSIOLOGY holdings would see a label
indicating that the previous title was NIPS: NEWS IN PHYSIOLOGICAL
SCIENCES, and vice-versa.

Buddy Pennington
Serial Acquisitions Librarian
UMKC - University Libraries
800 E. 51st Street
Kansas City, MO  64110
816-235-1548
816-333-5584 (fax)
penningtonb@umkc.edu

UMKC University Libraries: Connecting Learners to the World of Knowledge

www.umkc.edu/lib

-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
[mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of Carol Morse
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 2:25 PM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] NIPS

We always break them.
Carol Morse

>>> afreitas@SLC.EDU 5/13/2005 10:43:04 AM >>>
Hello everyone,

I have a problem, NIPS: NEWS IN PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES changed its title
to PHYSIOLOGY, in the middle of a volume. Our library binds this title.
The question is: do I bind this volume together or do I break it into
two volumes since they do have two different titles????

thank you
Angelica
Sarah Lawrence College