Since there were no issues between the Dec. 13 and Jan. 1 dates, perhaps
the publisher's intent was for Dec. 13 to be combined issue 4718/4719,
Jan. 1 to be combined 4720/4721, which would make Jan. 10 - 4722, Jan.
17 - 4723, and Jan. 24 - 4724 to get back on what the publisher thinks
is the correct(?) numbering schedule.
Frances Piesbergen
Ref. Leadership Team/
Govt Docs Coordinator
Room 320 (MC 60) Dep.#0326
Thomas Jefferson Library ph. (314) 516-5084
Univ. of MO - St. Louis fax: (314) 516-5853
One University Blvd. e-m: sfrpies@umsl.edu
St. Louis, MO 63121
-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
[mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of Koveleskie, Judith
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 9:57 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] FW: [SERIALST] New Statesman - Numbering Problem
Lynne and others,
What Lynne lists below is also what I have and there are not any missing
issues. For some reason they have skipped 4723 and the issue for
January 24 is 4724. I don't know why the publisher thinks the numbering
is wrong, but they do and have made this adjustment.
Judith A. Koveleskie
Periodicals Librarian
Seton Hill University
Reeves Memorial Library
Greensburg, PA 15601
724-838-7828
This document may contain confidential information and is intended
solely for the use of the addressee. If you received it in error, please
contact the sender at once and destroy the document. The document may
contain information subject to restrictions of the Family Educational
Rights and Privacy and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Acts. Such information may
not be disclosed or used in any fashion outside the scope of the service
for which you are receiving the information.
-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
[mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU]On Behalf Of Lynne Weaver
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 9:02 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [SERIALST] FW: [SERIALST] New Statesman - Numbering Problem
My issues were tracking just fine, so I was muddling along very well
until I got the list message!
I have received:
Dec 13 4718
Jan 1 4719/4720
Jan 10 4721
Jan 17 4722
Why, then, is "Jan 10th actually 4722 and January 17th ... 4723"? What
issue am I missing that was supposed to be 4721?
Yours, confused,
Lynne N. Weaver
Serials Coordinator
Lipscomb Library
Randolph-Macon Woman's College
2500 Rivermont Avenue
Lynchburg, VA 24503
434 947-8396
434 947-8134 (FAX)
lweaver@rmwc.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
[mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU]On Behalf Of Koveleskie, Judith
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 3:09 PM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [SERIALST] New Statesman - Numbering Problem
I thought others would like to know the response that came from the
publisher regarding the numbering of this title.
Judith A. Koveleskie
Periodicals Librarian
Seton Hill University
Reeves Memorial Library
Greensburg, PA 15601
724-838-7828
This document may contain confidential information and is intended
solely for the use of the addressee. If you received it in error, please
contact the sender at once and destroy the document. The document may
contain information subject to restrictions of the Family Educational
Rights and Privacy and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Acts. Such information may
not be disclosed or used in any fashion outside the scope of the service
for which you are receiving the information.
THEIR RESPONSE:
The publisher had a problem with their numering which was to be
corrected with the Jan 24th issue. If you have the 1/17 you should not
be
missing anything. Below is some information I received from the
publisher a
couple weeks ago. Thanks- Carissa
Unfortunately, despite my instructions the numbering of the double
issues
was done incorrectly and this hasn't been rectified for the start of
2005 -
sooooooooo........Jan 10th is actually 4722 and January 17th should be
4723.
The sequence will be corrected for next week so Jan 24th will be 4724.
best wishes,
stephen
MY INQUIRY:
The January 24, 2005 issue of New Statesman is predicted as Vol.
134, No. 4723 (New Statesman & Society Vol. 18, no. 842 is the alternate
numbering. However, the issue itself is numbered Vol. 134, No. 4724
(New
Statesman & Society Vol. 18, no. 843).
I don't think we missed an issue because we have January 17. Things
like
this drive librarians crazy.
