From: "Desjarlais, Bette LEG" <BDesjarlais@legassembly.sk.ca>
Subject: RE: Working with LDRs -- Laura Vogler
Date:  Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:34:36 -0600

Please reply to the list.  This is a concern for us as well.

Bette Desjarlais
Director of Support Services    Phone:  (306) 787-2278
Saskatchewan Legislative Library        Fax:      (306) 787-7400
234 Legislative Building
Regina, Saskatchewan  S4S 0B3

E-mail:   bdesjarlais@legassembly.sk.ca

-----Original Message-----
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:28:34 -0500
Sender: voglerl <voglerl@wabash.edu>
Subject: Working with LDRs

To catalogers and non-catalogers alike, this question is for anyone who
maintains their libraries union list holdings.

I am not a cataloger myself, but I maintain our libraries union list
holdings in OCLC.  I am aware of the different methods for reporting
microform holdings in LDRs - one of those being that all formats of a
particular title are reported on the hardcopy record.  I have not seen
this issue addressed in the new ANSI/NISO Z39.71 standards so I thought
I would query the list.  Is it appropriate to use separate SCHDs for
each format of a title retained at a library (such as print, microform,
or electronic resource) if one uses the hardcopy to record all holdings
formats?  If it is not appropriate, I would be curious to know why if
anyone knows the reason.

Thanks in advance for any and all input.

Laura

Laura Vogler
Serials Manager
Wabash College Library
301 West Wabash Avenue
Crawfordsville IN 47933