-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Periodicals shelving in public libraries... --
         BuddyPennington
   Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 08:45:03 -0800
   From: Carol Morse <MorsCa@WWC.EDU>

 I would definitely keep them all together for the reasons you mentioned
(i.e. confusion).Carol
Morse ********************************************************************************

Carol Morse                                                  Tel.  509)
527-2684
Serials Librarian                                             Fax 509)
527-2001
Walla Walla College Library                     Email  morsca@wwc.edu
104 S.W. Adams St.
College Place, WA  99324-1586 Give us strength for the journey and
wisdom to know the way.
********************************************************************************

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Periodicals shelving in public libraries...
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:16:37 -0600
From: "MD_Buddy (Buddy Pennington)" <MD_Buddy@KCLIBRARY.ORG>

Hi all,

We currently have our 980 periodicals in closed stacks, but we are
moving
into a new building that will allow for the periodicals to be in open
stacks.  The question has come up whether we should pull out the popular

titles and separate them from the other periodicals.  This would result
in
three periodical collections:  the newspapers, the popular periodicals,
and
the non-popular periodicals.  All would be arranged in alphabetical
order by
title.

I am leery of doing it this way for several reasons.  It creates more
work
for staff and customers end up looking in two places for the periodicals

they want.  You also have to deal with signage directing customers to
the
popular periodicals shelf, not to mention determining what exactly is a
popular title (and trying to make that consistent with what the public
considers popular!).  My thinking is that it would be easier on both
staff
and customers if the periodicals were all in one section, arranged
alphabetically, and the newspapers were in a different section, also
arranged alphabetically.

Has anyone out there tried the "popular periodical" approach?  Or does
anyone have any thoughts on the matter I can share with our library
planning
committee?

Buddy Pennington
Document Delivery Librarian
Kansas City Public Library
md_buddy@kclibrary.org
816-701-3552