Date:         Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:37:15 -0500
From:         Peter Picerno <ppicerno@NOVA.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Forbes/Forbes ASAP (Tom Evans)

This becomes a real problem when you consider that it, just like Forbes
FYI, has its own ISSN ... and if one were to include all three
publications into one bindery volume that would consist of three different
ISSNs bound into one volume (considering the ASAP and FYI as supplements
-- which one could question since they have ISSNs which are different from
the 'parent' publication they are supplementing). However, if they begin
to replace 'real' issues of the magazine with the FYI and ASAP
'supplements' then that does create a justification for considering them
as one bindable unit ... maybe!

Just my $.02~

Peter Picerno

-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
[mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU]On Behalf Of Tom Evans
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:04 PM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Forbes/Forbes ASAP (Tom Evans)

Date:         Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:54:36 -0500
From:         Tom Evans Library/Periodicals <evans@canisius.edu>
Organization: Canisius College
Subject:      Re: Forbes/Forbes ASAP (Jeanette Skwor)

Now that it looks as if the numbering of Forbes ASAP has been
incorporated into Forbes' numbering, how are you all out there going to
handle it? Are you going to bind it with Forbes after you find a bib
record that confirms this change? Other suggestions? Thanks in advance.

Tom Evans
Periodicals Librarian
Canisius College Library
2001 Main Street
Buffalo, NY 14208
Phone: 716-888-2932
Fax: 716-888-2887
e-mail: evans@canisius.edu