Re: HBR -- Janice White -- Janice White Stephen Clark 17 Dec 2001 16:08 UTC

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: HBR -- Janice White -- Jeanette Skwor
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:25:53 -0500
From: Janice White <janice.white@fct-cf.gc.ca>

Jeanette,
The person you emailed is the person I have been dealing with since this
whole mess started for me 10 months ago.  She is the person that has
argued back and forth with me about the payment we made for the 2000
issues and her insistance that the issues were shipped and somehow went
astray in our offices.  I see she is stating that it is the Subscription
agents fault that you didn't receive the proper number of issues.
Unfortunately, she has an excuse for everything and I am still trying to
get her to tell me how to purchase our missing issues!

I might suggest everyone email her now since her email is now of public
record here in the listserv.  I doubt any of us will receive an answer
any better than the one I rec'd and the 1 you rec'd though.

I am at the point where I am tried of "begging" her for the issues we
are missing.  I figure that they would be glad to have people interested
in their publication, but I am seen that is definitely not the case.

Thanks for everyones support and comments.  I am continuing on with my
fight and I am sure my contact in HBR is at the point where she will
stop replying because I am so persistant!

Janice White
Federal Court of Canada Library

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: HBR -- Janice White
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 08:21:21 -0600
From: "Skwor, Jeanette" <skworj@uwgb.edu>

***I've been to Harvard Publishing's website and had shaken my head over
the mission statement posted there; thank you to David Goodman for
thinking to share it here.  I am in total agreement with Janice White, and
I felt that HBR may not have been aware of the policies of their
fulfillment house, so I wrote directly to them.

***See my letter to them, and their response (in reverse order) below:
-----------------------------
Dear J. Skwor:

Thank you for your valuable comments and feedback. A one-term subscription
to Harvard Business Review was to be 10 issues effective with new orders
beginning in January 2001.  The invitations to subscribe along with the
insert cards in our magazine state the amount of issues a customer is due
to receive in the offer, along with the term and price of the
subscription.

You have ordered your subscription is via Faxon/Rowecom, a subscription
agency.  If you do have a missing issue claim within the term of your
subscription (Nov/Dec 2000 to September 2001)please contact them at
1-800-999-5594. They are due to represent you with missing issues,
inquries and subscription orders for Harvard Business Review.

Our customer service office has placed your subscription order correctly.
We apologize if the subscription agency did not make the terms of your
subscription apparent.

Sincerely,

Liz Sottile
Circulation Coordinator
Harvard Business Review
60 Harvard Way 300NB
Boston, MA 02163

ph: (617) 783-7410
fax: (617) 783-7494
esottile@hbsp.harvard.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: cem@hbsp.harvard.edu [mailto:cem@hbsp.harvard.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:21 PM
To: esottile@hbsp.harvard.edu
Subject: DT20011213_0000000377 Feedback <skworj@uwgb.edu>

> Feedback from user@143.200.208.50
>
> Name:  J. Skwor
>
> E-mail:  skworj@uwgb.edu
>
> Subject:  Suggestions and Feedback
>
> Topic:  General feedback
>
> Order ID:
>
> Message:
>
> I am the serials librarian at Cofrin Library, University of WI - Green
> Bay.    I am having a disagreement with your fulfillment house.
>
> Cofrin Library has not been receiving all the issues of Harvard Business
> Review in a given year, and I am told by Neodata that is because at the
> time we paid, HBR was publishing (#) of issues, and that's all we paid
> for, so that's all we will get.
>
> They cashed our vendor's check for 2001 on Oct. 26, 2000, and ended our
> subscription with the Sept. 2001 issue because, I am told, in 2000, only
> 10 issues were published and therefore that's all we paid for, and all we
> have coming.
>
> I had sent in subscription corrections twice during the year, and last
> week went around and around with a customer rep at the "Orders, Inquiries
> and address changes" number given in the magazine.
>
> I also sent a letter describing the problem to a library serials listserv
> I am on, and copied hbursubs@neodata.com.  I received the automatic reply,
> saying I would receive a response in 2 -3 business days, but nothing
> since.
>
> My letter to the serials list started quite a conversation, with several
> libraries hopping on my bandwagon, and others being told issues as current
> as Sept. are out of print (in response to claims.)
>
> I think you need to know how these matters are being handled.  If you want
> to sell HBR by the issue, I would suggest you change your "Rates per year"
> to "Rates per issue".
>
> Yours truly,
>
> J. Skwor
> Cofrin Library Serials Dept.
> Univ. of WI - Green Bay
> 2420 Nicolet Dr.
> Green Bay, WI 54311

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: HBR -- David Goodman
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 09:21:42 -0500
From: "Janice White" <janice.white@fct-cf.gc.ca>

Ok now I know I should let this go but after reading these mission
statements and policies, I couldn't let it go without a comment.  I
speak my mind when I see things that are unjust and wrong.

I am sorry but they have negated their claims to work at improving the
practice of management by creating such a huge disaster with their
customers and their subscriptions.  If this is an improvement, I would
hate to see how they run their offices.

Publisher of choice for those experts with important management ideas?
Is there a new management idea out there that I am not aware of?  I
always thought management should accommodate and encourage feedback from
their clients and employees?  I see the total opposite.  I wonder if
they have a management directive on communication skills?

I wonder if the latest thinking in management involves not thinking at
all.  I have not seen 1 thing that they have done that has been forward
thinking, in fact it seems we have gone back to the dark ages of
communication, where it takes months to resolve problems.  For all our
technology, we seem to have lost a key factor, courtesy, effective
communication and plain old thinking..

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: HBR
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:37:45 -0500
From: David Goodman <dgoodman@phoenix.princeton.edu>

>>From  the HBR web site,
http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu/inside/about.html
I quote:

"The mission of Harvard Business School Publishing is to improve the
practice of management and its impact on a changing world.
[...]
We strive to be the publisher of choice for those ...
experts with important management ideas and a desire to improve the
practice of management worldwide.
[...]
As a result of our
association with Harvard Business School, we have
access to the latest thinking in management."

David Goodman, Princeton University Biology Library
dgoodman@princeton.edu            609-258-3235