---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:44:55 -0700
From: Dan Lester <dan@riverofdata.com>
Subject: Re: Cost per title... (Albert henderson)

Albert and others,

As I read this, you're implying that web citations would necessarily
refer to mediocre materials.  Do you seriously believe that all web
content is bad, and that no reputable style manual would thus make it
easy for an author to refer to it?  Isn't it the duty of a style
manual to make provisions for all types of things that might be cited?

If my inference is incorrect, I'd be interested in learning what you
DO mean by the comment quoted below.

dan

Monday, October 30, 2000, 6:44:37 AM, you wrote:

MT> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
MT> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 16:46:16 -0400
MT> From: Albert Henderson <NobleStation@COMPUSERVE.COM>
MT> Subject: Re: Cost per title... (Buddy Pennington)

MT> I realize Serialst members tolerate mediocrity

MT> I don't believe authors and editors should force
MT> their readers to do so. Isn't that what the
MT> library crisis is all about?

--
Dan Lester, Data Wrangler  dan@RiverOfData.com
3577 East Pecan, Boise, Idaho  83716-7115 USA
www.riverofdata.com  www.postcard.org  www.gailndan.com