---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:26:17 -0400
From: John Radencich <radencic@FIU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Electronic journal cataloging question (Lori J. Terrill)

The "additional physical format" question is irrelevant, as they are not the
same works by any means whatsoever.  If you want perhaps you can make some
mention of a publication that contains electronic abstracts.  Sometimes we'll
add the URL for the abstracts, noting it as such.  We certainly wouldn't present
it as the electronic version of the work.  It's a bit misleading.

John Radencich
Library-Cataloging Dept.
Florida International University
Miami, Florida

Marcia Tuttle wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:15:57 -0600
> From: Lori J. Terrill <Lori@UWYO.EDU>
> Subject: electronic journal cataloging question
>
> I am cataloging the electronic version of Computational statistics.  The
> electronic version contains only abstracts, not full-text articles.  My
> question is how to handle the "additional physical format" information since
> the print version and the electronic version are not equivalent in content.
> Would I still use 530 and 776 fields?  Is this situation discussed in any of
> the standard references?  If so, please direct me to the appropriate
> sections.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lori Terrill
> Cataloger
> University of Wyoming Libraries
> lori@uwyo.edu