E-journal processing: summary of responses
Madeline P Windsor 15 Sep 2000 00:20 UTC
To All-
Sometime back I wrote asking about staffing for ejournals. The following
is my summary of the responses
Collection development of ejournals was a combination of
>ejournal selection was part of the collection development teams
assignments
>or not as frequently
one person who was doing everything, that is, selection and
processing
Reviewing the agreements and negotiating the agreements
>at least one full time person, with some other assignments, but
mostly worked on ejournals
>sometimes the "negotiating" was just in-house with their own legal
department
>consortium was handled normally outside the roll of the respondents
(upper management)
Cataloging the titles
>was included with other cataloging assignments, with maybe one
cataloger as the focal point
Do you have staff that assigned, full time to your ejournal project?
>most of the time it was - yes, but said it was not "always" 100% of
their time -- it might depend on the time of year
Once you have a core list of ejournals, did the staffing change?
>No one seemed to have a long enough history for this question
Does anyone know of a benchmark?
>No
By the time you added up that this person did 20% of their time doing, etc
... Let me summerize that the average staffing level was approximately 1 to
1 1/2 FTE working on ejournal projects. (This doesn't include cataloging,
to little information).
I am also assuming that as a Library establishes a core list of ejournals,
and has dealt with most of their publishers, the staffing will level off and
will go down to a 1/2 or to 1 FTE. Does this sound reasonable??
Again I thank you and
Have a great day!
Madeline Windsor
windsor@bnl.gov
631 344 5069