-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Microfilm Reader Printers (Marcella Lesher) -Reply
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 08:07:05 -0600
From: Dana Belcher <dbelcher@mailclerk.ecok.edu>

We also choose Minolta's SP2000 since we could reuse our existing lenses
and
carriers.  However, a complete unit was still cheaper than a complete
unit from
Canon.  We've had ours for over a year with absolutely no maintenance
calls!

Dana Belcher, Periodicals/Acquisitions Librarian
East Central University
Linscheid Library
200 S. Stadium Drive
Ada, OK 74820
580-310-5564

Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:50:56 -0500
From: Marcella Lesher <acadmarc@STMARYTX.EDU>
Subject: Re: Microfilm Reader Printers (Susan Sturgeon)

We went through the process of choosing reader/printers earlier this
year
and received
several responses from both Minolta and Canon users.  Most respondents
seemed to
be pleased with their choices of either the Minolta SP2000 or the Canon
digital readers
(I don't remember the model number on the Canons).  We chose the Minolta
because we
could reuse our lenses and fiche/film carriers.  We've only had the new
Minolta since
April but so far so good.  If you will be using coin-op machines be sure
and check on
capatibility.  Our technician did have some problems with installation.

Marcella Lesher
Academic Library
St. Mary's University
San Antonio

> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:42:08 -0400
> From: "Susan E. Sturgeon" <ssturgeo@SALEM.MASS.EDU>
> Subject: microfilm reader printers
>
> Need some information on the newest and best state of the art microform
> printers.  Thanks.
>
> SUSAN STURGEON
> SERIALS DEPARTMENT
> SALEM STATE COLLEGE LIBRARY
> 352 LAFAYETTE ST.
> SALEM MA 01970
> NEW E-mail address:susan.sturgeon@salem.mass.edu