2 messages:

1)----------------------------------

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Title change issues with section titles -- Lori J. Terrill
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 12:36:22 +0600
From: Frieda Rosenberg <friedat@email.unc.edu>

Lori,
  In the linking field, your section designations/titles are all
transcribed in subfield t.  (See CONSER Editing Guide, Links, p. 4,
section 2.)
  New modules come out slowly, and much is going on all the time, and I
am not sure if that module is on a fast track or slow track!
          Regards, Frieda
          Frieda Rosenberg
          UNC-Chapel Hill

2)-------------------

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Title change issues with section titles -- Lori J. Terrill
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 12:38:24 -0400
From: Nancy Burns <nburns@phoenix.princeton.edu>

        Linking entry fields (765-787) should include the entire title
proper--i.e., subfields a, n, and p from the 245.  There are no subfield
delimiters for the section number and title; the complete title proper
goes into subfield t of the linking entry field.

        An example from the CONSER editing guide:

785  00  |t Journal of polymer science.  Part A, General papers

                                Nancy Burns
                                Cataloging Unit IV (Serials)
                                Princeton University Library
                                nburns@princeton.edu

On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Lori Terrill wrote:

> highlights, and a section title ($p) to denote the city, Bismarck,
> N.D. When constructing the 780 field in the record for the new title,
> do I record the section title in any way since there is no $p listed
> for 780 field? (Subfield w will give the number of the record for that
> part.)
>
> Also, does anyone know when the promised section on common titles and
> section titles for the Conser cataloging manual will be available?
> (It is referred to in a footnote, Module 6, page 29.)
>
>