---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 22:53:03 -0500
From: Ian Woodward <iwoodward@MAIL.COLGATE.EDU>
Subject: Re: If you classify bounds,
                  what about microform? -- Sherri L. Pa rker

        We have classified the bound periodicals in our branch library (not
the main library).  It is not a procedure with virtues to which I would
attest (I kvetch on request).  All of the fiche and film boxes retain
labels.  Yours, IW

I. Woodward
Serials Office
Colgate University Libraries
13 Oak Dr.
Hamilton, N.Y. 13346
USA
Tel.: 315-228-7306
Fax: 315-228-7934

> ----------
> From:         Stephen D. Clark[SMTP:sdclar@mail.wm.edu]
> Reply To:     SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
> Sent:         Friday, February 25, 2000 4:21 PM
> To:   SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
> Subject:      If you classify bounds, what about microform? -- Sherri L.
> Parker
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: If you classify bounds, what about microform?
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 14:31:37 -0500
> From: "Sherri L. Parker" <sparker@depauw.edu>
> Organization: DePauw University
>
>
> We are a small library considering classifying our bound journals
> instead of filing them alphabetically.  We are curious to know for those
> institutions that do classify their bounds, how do they handle the
> microform?  Do you label each individual fiche or film with the call
> no?   Do you continue to file them alphabetically?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sherri Parker
> DePauw University
>