-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Business Week -- Deborah Harrell
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:44:53 -0500
From: Joseph Sollitto <sollitto@FAXON.COM>

Hello:

The publisher has confirmed that the issue for December 27, 1999/January
3,
2000 is considered a double issue, although this is not reflected in its
numbering.

The numbers on subsequent issues are correct as printed.

>>-------- Original Message --------
>>Subject: Business Week
>>Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:05:33 -0500
>>From: Deborah Harrell <dharrell@westga.edu>
>>
>>The last issue in 1999 was Dec. 27, 1999-Jan. 3, 2000 and used #3661.
>>The
>>next issue, dated Jan. 10, 2000 used #3663.  Since the last issue in
>>1999
>>covered two weeks, do you think they just failed to print #3662 inside,
>>or
>>should the Jan 10th issue be #3662 and they "messed up"?  I looked back
>>at
>>the end of 1998 and beginning of 1999 to see if they skipped a number
>>then...and they didn't.
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Debbie Harrell
>>Ingram Library, State University of West Georgia
>>phone: 770-836-6498
>>fax: 770-836-6626
>>
>
Joseph Sollitto, Editor
Serials Update Service
Faxon, A RoweCom Company