We also still bind the journals that we retain. The bound journals reside in a storage facility and do see some use, though it’s primarily through ILL requests from other institutions. Our budget is healthy enough
to support binding. Even when we had to cut our budget after the 2009 recession, stopping binding was never on the table.
Being situated in Colorado, we use Houchen for commercial binding as they are the closest sizable commercial bindery (that I’m aware of). We still send some theses for binding along with the periodicals. No binding
of soft cover books, though.
Diane Westerfield, Electronic Resources & Serials Librarian
Colorado College, Tutt Library
diane.westerfield@coloradocollege.edu
(719) 389-6661
From: serialst@simplelists.com <serialst@simplelists.com>
On Behalf Of Steve Oberg
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 9:26 AM
To: serialst@simplelists.com
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] binding issue.
This email originated outside Colorado College. Do not click links or attachments unless you know the content is safe.
I’d like to provide a different perspective from the responses I’ve read thus far. Reading them, there seems a consensus that not binding is the way to go. Although I don’t deal with managing our print serials collection any more, that
group reports into me.
My library continues to bind journals and I am a strong proponent of doing so. This stuff is expensive, not just to purchase but to manage. We have a big investment in it. We’ve spent quite a bit of time reshaping our print journal collection
to ensure we acquire content that is core to the disciplines we support. Part of our core definition is longterm preservation and access. There is no better guarantee of longterm preservation of print journals than good binding, in my view.
Over the last ten years our print subscriptions have deliberately been sharply reduced in favor of online access, but we still subscribe to around 300 or so print journals, and I don’t see that number going down significantly for a long
time. So in part, we have reduced our binding costs that way, although they are still significant. Our bindery was recently purchased by and consolidated with a sort of conglomerate. They sharply raised prices and imposed conditions that required us to rethink
the binding frequency workflow (minimum number of boxes per shipment) and so on. It’s been a pain in the neck, and I wish we had more binding options, but on their side, I’m sure they’re coping with reduced flow of materials to bind as libraries stop binding
and/or switch to online.
Another aspect of our local situation worth mentioning is that last year, we moved our entire inventory of bound journals into remote storage. I think the total number was around 60,000 vols., and was done as a key piece of allowing us
the swing/growth space to convert our entire print collection of books from Dewey to LC. As part of that process, we implemented a high quality scanner located in remote storage along with a daily workflow whereby students/staff receive article requests and
can scan articles onsite for delivery through ILLiad. Good binding is a critical piece of being able to deliver high quality scans. And bound journals in storage are yes, still being used quite a bit. As we continue to add new volumes for current subscriptions,
the remote storage collection continues to grow as well.
Hopefully this perspective gives food for thought. As with other libraries, budgets will grow increasingly tight and we may finally be forced to rob Peter to pay Paul. I don’t know.
Steve
Steve Oberg
Assistant Professor and Group Leader for Resource Description and Digital Initiatives
Buswell Library | Wheaton College (IL) | +1 (630) 752-5852
From:
<serialst@simplelists.com> on behalf of Matthew Person <mperson@mbl.edu>
Reply-To: "serialst@simplelists.com" <serialst@simplelists.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 9:25 AM
To: LeAnne Rumler <lrumler@hillsdale.edu>, "serialst@simplelists.com" <serialst@simplelists.com>, Rola Hajj <rhage@lau.edu.lb>
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] binding issue.
Yes...we stopped binding about 15 years ago. As LeAnne says, if your bound issues are not well used, string, nothing, magazine boxes, plastic bags, all can do the job.
Good luck, Matt
Matthew Person
Marine Biological Laboratory
MBLWHOI Library
Technical Services Coordinator
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-9061
From:
serialst@simplelists.com <serialst@simplelists.com> on behalf of LeAnne Rumler <lrumler@hillsdale.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 8:50 AM
To: serialst@simplelists.com <serialst@simplelists.com>
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] binding issue.
Hello Rola,
It may be time to do an in depth evaluation of your periodical collection and the use it is getting. Is there enough use of your bound periodicals to continue binding rather than recycling? We found that our students
and faculty rarely used most of our periodicals once we bound them and moved them to the 3rd floor. They got no use at all if there was an electronic alternative. We stopped professionally binding most of our titles and started using cardboard ‘binding’ boxes
for the titles we continued to bind. Most of our titles we keep only current year on the shelf and then recycle.
Hope this helps,
LeAnne Rumler
Technical Services Librarian
Mossey Library
Hillsdale College
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 26, 2020, at 6:33 AM, Rola Hajj <rhage@lau.edu.lb> wrote: