Good afternoon,
Others may have a better (perhaps more correct!) answer, but for me it depends:
I use “Jan/Feb” for a single issue (or single bound volume) that contains/represents both months,
but I’ll use “Jan-Feb” if I’m creating a holdings summary that represents 2 or more items.
Hope this helps,
Cyndi
Cyndi MacCluggage
University Cataloger, Mortensen Library
860-768-4811
University of Hartford
200 Bloomfield Avenue
West Hartford, CT 06117
From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG]
On Behalf Of Dusty Gorman
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 11:59 AM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: [SERIALST] Cataloging question
Hello,
I have a question I have been unable to find an answer for. When receiving a journal issue or cataloging a bound journal what is the correct way to catalog?:
Jan-Dec
Jan-Feb
Or
Jan/Dec
Jan/Feb
I have heard both ways, but the argument seems to focus on personal preference and I have been unable to find a cataloging rule that supports either. Is there a cataloging rule that says – or / is better than the other?
Dusty
Dusty Gorman | Electronic Resources Librarian
UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND
Collins Memorial Library
1500 N. Warner St. #1021
Tacoma, WA 98416-1021
T: 253.879.3617
dgorman@pugetsound.edu
pugetsound.edu/library
To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1