Good afternoon,

 

Others may have a better (perhaps more correct!) answer, but for me it depends:

 

I use “Jan/Feb” for a single issue (or single bound volume) that contains/represents both months,

but I’ll use “Jan-Feb” if I’m creating a holdings summary that represents 2 or more items.

 

Hope this helps,

Cyndi

 

Cyndi MacCluggage

University Cataloger, Mortensen Library

860-768-4811

cmacclugg@hartford.edu

 

University of Hartford

200 Bloomfield Avenue

West Hartford, CT 06117

 

From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Dusty Gorman
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 11:59 AM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: [SERIALST] Cataloging question

 

Hello,

 

I have a question I have been unable to find an answer for. When receiving a journal issue or cataloging a bound journal what is the correct way to catalog?:

 

Jan-Dec

Jan-Feb

 

Or

 

Jan/Dec

Jan/Feb

 

I have heard both ways, but the argument seems to focus on personal preference and I have been unable to find a cataloging rule that supports either. Is there a cataloging rule that says – or / is better than the other?

 

Dusty

 

Dusty Gorman | Electronic Resources Librarian
UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND
Collins Memorial Library

1500 N. Warner St. #1021
Tacoma, WA 98416-1021
T: 253.879.3617

dgorman@pugetsound.edu
pugetsound.edu/library

 

 


To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1



To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1