Hi Kathryn

This is the response I got from my EBSCO rep. Hope this helps.

Wilma

 

 

Hi Wilma

 

Well……here is the story on Time

 

Per the Editor

The volume numbers for the Jan. 16 and Jan. 23 issues were incorrect. We identified the problem and corrected the volume number beginning with the Jan. 30 issue. We apologize for any confusion. Cheers, Olivia Waxman / Reporter

 

So this means:

when they say the corrected the issues with the Jan 30^th issue they are advising the following:

 

Jan. 16, 2017  v.189:n.3……… should have been issue #1 but was listed as #3

Jan.23, 2017  v.189:n.4……… Should have been issue #2 but was listed as #4

Jan. 30, 2017  v. 189:n.5…….mislabeled as v.189:n.3 – This is where they corrected it, and Jan 30^th is truly issue #3

Feb.6, 2017  v.189:n.6…..mislabeled as v.189:n.4 – With their “correction” this is really issue #4

Feb 13, 2017  v.189:n.7…..mislabeled as v.189:n.5 - With their “correction” this is really issue #5

 

So going forward, Feb 20^th will be #6, Feb 27^th will be #7

 

So you should probably notate your records that Jan 16 is issue #1 – misprinted as #3 and Jan 23^rd is issue #2 – misprinted as #4

 

Carissa

 

Carissa Buckley

Customer Service Representative

EBSCO Information Services, US

Toll free phone:  (844) 292-5799

Phone:  (205) 408-5057

Fax:  (205) 981-5178

Email: cbuckley@ebsco.com
www.EBSCO.com

 

 

From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Kathryn Dalius
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 9:06 AM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: [SERIALST] Time magazine_duplicate numbering Jan-Feb 2017

 

 

To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1