Walk-in users can use a heavily controlled public terminal (thin client) near the reference desk where we limit and monitor usage. I can share details of this setup if anyone
is interested.
Walk-in user provision is pretty standard in almost all of our licenses, the notable exceptions being SciFinder and LexisNexis Academic.
See Wiley for example:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/licenseAgreement
“Authorized Users
… Walk-in Users from the general public or business invitees may also be permitted by the Licensee to access Wiley Online Library from designated terminals with a Licensee-controlled IP address. These designated terminals shall be physically
located on the Site in premises such as libraries or similar physical premises directly controlled by the Licensee.”
JSTOR:
2. Authorized Users
Access to content on JSTOR is available for “Authorized Users”, meaning:
…
iv
on-site users physically present and authorized to be on the Institutional Licensee’s premises (“Walk-In Users”);
Diane Westerfield, Electronic Resources & Serials Librarian
Tutt Library, Colorado College
diane.westerfield@coloradocollege.edu
(719) 389-6661
From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG]
On Behalf Of Judith Koveleskie
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 11:02 AM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] OCLC holdings for print periodicals
How can you allow public use, including downloading, and still be in compliance with your license?
Judith A. Koveleskie, Serials Librarian
Seton Hill University, Reeves Memorial Library
1 Seton Hill Drive, Greensburg, PA 15601-1548
724-838-7828
This document may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you received it in error, please contact the sender at once and
destroy the document. The document may contain information subject to restrictions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Acts. Such information may not be disclosed or used in any fashion outside the scope of the service for
which you are receiving the information.
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Diane Westerfield <dwesterfield@coloradocollege.edu> wrote:
We catalog the stable e-journals that are in JSTOR, Project Muse, and journal packages where there isn’t a lot
of churn. We also catalog the individual electronic journal purchases. But we don’t catalog the aggregator-only content. Journal cataloging is done by the Periodicals Coordinator.
Support of ILL seems like a good-citizen thing for libraries to do, at least if you have sufficient ILL resources.
We have a full-time staff person for ILL along with student workers.
On a side note, we allow public walk-ins and have a dedicated, limited computer terminal for public use. People
can download and print articles if they need to.
Diane Westerfield, Electronic Resources & Serials Librarian
Tutt Library, Colorado College
diane.westerfield@coloradocollege.edu
From: Serials in Libraries Discussion
Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG]
On Behalf Of Judith Koveleskie
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 1:43 PM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] OCLC holdings for print periodicals
Although the standard seems to be that all holdings should be listed in OCLC, we have only listed our print holdings, because those
are the only ones that we will lend via ILL. Even if a person came to our library, they would not have access to the online journals, so I never saw the point in cataloging them. I say, do what works for you. If you have online journals that you can lend,
then include them.
Judith A. Koveleskie, Serials Librarian
Seton Hill University, Reeves Memorial Library
1 Seton Hill Drive, Greensburg, PA 15601-1548
724-838-7828
This document may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you received it in error, please contact the sender at once and
destroy the document. The document may contain information subject to restrictions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Acts. Such information may not be disclosed or used in any fashion outside the scope of the service for
which you are receiving the information.
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Sheldon, Karen <karen.sheldon@delval.edu> wrote:
Hi all,
I’m hoping to get a better understanding of what other libraries do so I can develop a policy here. Many moons ago, all our print periodicals were listed in OCLC and our local catalog.
Over the years, as we deleted a title in print, the item would be removed from OCLC and the catalog. It seems that in some instances the title would remain in OCLC, but would be updated to reflect online holdings rather than print.
We currently have about 200 periodical titles in OCLC but our print periodicals collection is rapidly diminishing. Continuing to delete anything we no longer have in print seems
unfair to the ILL community. On the other hand, loading in the thousands of online-only periodicals we have seems like a gargantuan task.
I’ve discussed this with my fellow librarians but we can’t reach a consensus about what would be both ethically right and time-efficient. Anyone want to share their thoughts?
Karen Sheldon
Electronic and Instructional Services Librarian
Delaware Valley University
700 East Butler Ave., Doylestown PA 18901
215.489.4968 |
karen.sheldon@delval.edu
To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1
To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1
To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1
To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1