We do it if we consider the publication very important. Otherwise, we wouldn’t do it. Most gaps are in print that rarely gets used.
Abbi Stauber
Library Technician – McCartney Library
Geneva College
724-847-6693
acgregg@geneva.edu
From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG]
On Behalf Of Monica Howell
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 5:16 PM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: [SERIALST] Filling in back issues of print journals?
Hello all,
I'm a relatively new serials technician and have been debating the relative merits of filling in incomplete volumes of print journals
at my institution. Sometimes there's a gap in the middle of a run that seems obvious to fill when presented with the opportunity, particularly for a title with no online access or to which we might conceivably no longer have online access at some future time.
Other times our holdings for a certain title end in the middle of a volume, and I'm left with the decision about whether to attempt to complete that volume.
What is your institution's approach to this situation? Would you try to complete a volume at the end of your print holdings for
a title? Would it matter if you had online access, particularly if you felt your institution would always maintain that access due to the importance/status of the title?
I appreciate your thoughts!
Best,
Monica
Monica Howell, MLS, EdS
Serials Technician, Archivist
Greenawalt Library
Northwestern Health Sciences University
2501 W. 84th St., Bloomington, MN 55431
mhowell@nwhealth.edu
P: 952-888-4777 x218
To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1