Notes of Practice –Public Display Notes regarding Holdings
Public Notes describing Serial Holdings generally fall into three categories: 1) Item level notes describing a particular volume or item; 2) General notes describing a Library’s treatment or processing of some or all serial holdings (i.e., Analysis & Classification treatment, OffSite, etc.); or 3) Specific notes describing a Library’s holdings or temporary shelving arrangements (Scattered Holdings, Latest issues shelved in Current Periodicals, etc.)
1. Item Level Notes – Recorded in Aleph Item record OPAC Note.
Notes describing the particular item or volume in hand. For example:
Library’s copy lacks issue no. 5.
Library’s copy signed by Walt Whitman.
Library’s copy is a reprint volume ([Name & Date of reprint publisher])
2. 852 subfield $z
Notes describing a Library’s treatment policy or shelving practices. For example:
Library’s holdings are Fully Analyzed and Classified Together.
Some volumes held OffSite – check Item holdings for location information
Some of library’s copies are reprint volumes.
3. 866 subfield $z
Notes applying broadly to a specific library’s holdings. For example:
Library lacks scattered issues.
Library lacks numerous issues.
Library's copy of the "Photography" issues of this title are shelved at: TR1 .W67.
(i.e., At a different Library of Congress Classification Number)
Latest year only (Latest two years only, etc.)
Latest year only; earlier volumes held Offsite
For notes that apply to the Holdings of a specific Library, include notes for public display in 866 subfield $z.
(If the note is for internal library use and not for public display, use 866 subfield $x.)
In practice, when moving Bibliographic 866 statements to Holdings records, almost all Notes that appear in Bib 866 subfield $i need to be moved to Holdings 852 subfield $z or 866 subfield $z.
<snip>
Hello all,
I am embarking on a large project to bring up to date my Library’s Local Holdings Records (LHR). I have noticed that the existing LHR with a retention schedule (current year, latest edition, current 3 years, etc.) have the holdings text in the 852 field, subfield z. I did find some OCLC documentation that states to use subfield z for general holdings notes, but is this preferable to using 866 for holdings statements such as “current year”?
Thanks,
Sally
************************************************************
Sarah (Sally) Glasser
Serials/Electronic Resources Librarian
022B Axinn Library
123 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1
To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1