Hi Lynne,

 

What about doing a record overlay? This should keep the order and checkin history intact. We are an Aleph library so this is what I would do.

 

Charles

 

 

Charles McElroy

Serials Department Head

Florida State University Libraries

711 West Madison Street

Tallahassee, FL  32306

 

Phone: 850-645-7911

Fax: 850-645-5671

Email: cnmcelroy@fsu.edu

 

 

 

From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Lynne Weaver
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:06 AM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: [SERIALST] MARC record question

 

I need some feedback on  how others handle this situation. We have serial holdings on a MARC record I’ll call Record A in our local system.  At some point after we imported that record from OCLC, they (OCLC) merged that record into what I’ll call Record B.  My choices now are: 1) keep our holdings on Record A in our system, not bothering with Record B at all, or 2) import Record B into our ILS, relink the items to that record, and delete Record A.  Choice 2 is technically correct; choice 1 is easier and maintains info like checkin history.

 

What do the rest of you do?  I’m in a big cleanup project, making sure our ILS and OCLC records and holdings correspond, and I’m running into a few of these.

 

Lynne Weaver

Serials Coordinator

Lipscomb Library

434 947-8396 Phone      434 947-8134 Fax

lweaver@randolphcollege.edu

Randolph College

Founded as Randolph-Macon Woman's College in 1891

2500 Rivermont Avenue

Lynchburg, VA 24503

www.randolphcollege.edu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1



To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1