1)
Subject: |
RE: [SERIALST] Cease claiming, checking in, binding |
From: |
"Koveleskie, Judith" <kovelesk@setonhill.edu> |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:58:00 -0500 |
Oh, c’mon ladies.
This is a commonly accepted accounting term and includes both
genders.
Judith A. Koveleskie, MLIS, MA
Periodicals Librarian
Seton Hill University
Reeves Memorial Library
1 Seton Hill Drive
Greensburg, PA 15601-1548
724-838-7828
This
document may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the
use of the addressee. If you received it in error, please contact the sender at
once and destroy the document. The document may contain information subject to
restrictions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy and the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Acts. Such information may not be disclosed or used in any
fashion outside the scope of the service for which you are receiving the
information.
From: SERIALST: Serials
in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Ginanni,
Katy
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:46 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] Cease claiming, checking in, binding
I
agree with Martha. I’m not a man, and neither is 75% of my
staff.
Katy
G.
Katy Ginanni, E-Access & Serials Librarian and liaison to
Soc/Anth & WAGS
Trinity University
Elizabeth Huth Coates Library
1 Trinity Place
San Antonio, TX 78212-7200
210-999-7613 ph.
210-999-8182 fax
katy.ginanni@trinity.edu
"Establishing lasting peace is the work of education; all
politics can do is keep us out of war." --Maria Montessori
From: SERIALST: Serials
in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of O'Brien,
Pamela
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 10:16 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] Cease claiming, checking in, binding
Martha, staff-hours would not mean the same thing as man-hours.
Staff is plural, which defeats the meaning.
Man-hours works for me.
Pamela L. O'Brien
Library Assistant
Biomedical Library
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
901-595-3389
From: SERIALST: Serials
in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Martha
M. Davis
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:14 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] Cease claiming, checking in, binding
Interesting thoughts on these procedures.
But.... STAFF hours please (not man-hours)
MMD
________________________________________________
2)
Subject: |
RE: [SERIALST] Cease claiming, checking in, binding |
From: |
"Deeken, Joanne" <jdeeken@utk.edu> |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:55:52 -0500 |
Me, too. I get quite upset
with the continued use of the male pronouns in a field dominated by
women. If you don’t want to use the term “staff hours”
which I greatly prefer, then use woman hours, not man hours. And if I hear one
more time that someone is going to “man” a desk instead of
“staff” a desk, I really will scream.
JoAnne
____________________________________________________
3)
Subject: |
RE: [SERIALST] Cease claiming, checking in, binding |
From: |
Susan Sturgeon <ssturgeon@salemstate.edu> |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:57:29 -0500 |
What's wrong with person hours?? A litle awkward, but easily
gotten used to!!
_____________________________________________________________________
4)
Subject: |
RE: [SERIALST] Cease claiming, checking in, binding |
From: |
"Bennett, Karla" <KBennett@wichita.gov> |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:08:14 -0600 |
I thought she was being politically correct –
“staff” being the generic term, as opposed to “man”
being the sexually specific term.
________________________________________________________________
5)
Subject: |
RE: [SERIALST] Cease claiming, checking in, binding |
From: |
"Thompson,Tracey" <thomtd@ad.nmsu.edu> |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:10:59 -0700 |
I would really prefer that we
not degenerate into debates on minutia. As my high school rhetoric
teacher stated, man is a generic term used to refer to both sexes. They
save the term of she/her for those of us that are special. The term
man-hours was not intended to offend anyone, and it would be nice to move
beyond the point where we correct each others grammar and can participate in
meaningful discussions. This list has not participated in snippy
discussions or flaming in the past, so please, let’s not start now.
__________________________________________________________________________
6)
Subject: |
RE: [SERIALST] Cease claiming, checking in, binding |
From: |
"O'Brien, Pamela" <Pamela.O'Brien@STJUDE.ORG> |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:04:40 -0600 |
Actually, I did check a dictionary before I wrote, my print
Merriam-Webster shows the definition of staff as “a body of
assistants…” or “a group of officers…” and then
the next entry is staffer : a member of a staff.
I just waded through several online dictionary definitions and
after 3 or 4 entries showing it as a plural word, there was one entry showing
the entry you refer to.
This just emphasizes to me the reason a word like man-hours, has
worked for so many years.
Everyone knows what it means. You don’t need to look it up in
a dictionary to prove what it means.
I’m just saying that a man-hour denotes a unit of one
person’s work for one hour. Simple as that…why complicate it?
Pam
Pamela L. O'Brien
Library Assistant
Biomedical Library
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
901-595-3389
________________________________________________________________________________
7)
Subject: |
RE: [SERIALST] Cease claiming, checking in, binding |
From: |
"Cynthia Hsieh" <chsieh@pacific.edu> |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:05:50 -0800 |
Just came back from the long
weekend and still in “playful” mode. Should we start using
“huwomen” instead of “human”? I am a woman who
doesn’t mind being addressed as man. Just joking.
Staff hour or man hour
doesn’t really matter to me because I know what Pamela was trying to
say.