So I misread it. Never mind. 

His doing P.R. for Moderna is, to put it mildly, disappointing; but maybe not surprising

for a former Times reporter, who's surely eager not to be tagged as "anti-vax," which

would finish his career. 

I'm also told that Moderna's placebo, unlike AstraZeneca's, is a neutral substance. So I

definitely got it wrong; although the fact that they tested just 11 people with that

experimental "vaccine" means that the very high "success rate," as reported, is not

credible, though it's done wonders for Moderna's stock. 

The last thing that we all need at this parlous moment is cheerleading by known 

COVID skeptics like Alex Berenson, whose tweets I will be sifting much more

carefully henceforth.

MCM