Asymptomatic disease spread is the Big Lie.

Political treatments and cures for Covid-19 (closing businesses and borders, quarantining healthy people, forcing everyone to wear face diapers, forcing the elderly to die in isolation, traumatizing children, pushing warp speed vaccines, etc.) have never been about protecting anyone from a disease. The pandemic psyop is a Trojan horse to usher in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. That should be obvious, but it still isn't to most people. The clever fascists never would have gotten away with it without three big lies:

1. A new coronavirus has been isolated.

2. The PCR test can detect the new virus.

3. A new virus can be transmitted asymptomatically. Meaning anyone can kill Grandma or everyone in a grocery store or a stadium by breathing on them, even if you're completely healthy.

Myths 1 and 2 are easy to debunk. What the scientists are seeing is a genetic sequence. Not an isolated virus. And the test only amplifies tiny shreds of DNA. Not a virus. The PCR doesn't test viral load, meaning there's no way to know how much "virus" anyone has. It's bullshit.

In this post I'll show you how we got to "asymptomatic spread is a real thing, and it will likely kill us all unless we never come into close contact with another human being again."

On January 28, Fauci said during a White House press briefing that epidemics have never been driven by asymptomatic carriers: 

"We would really like to see the data because, if there is asymptomatic transmission, it impacts certain policies that you do regarding screening, etc. But the one thing historically people need to realize is that, even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory-born viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there's a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers."

That sounds about right. Right? However, this statement was completely and utterly scripted, and was announced just in time for a study that was published two days later in the New England Journal of Medicine. The German study claimed to "confirm" that the "new coronavirus" could be transmitted asymptomatically. A mere three days later, the day after the study was published, Fauci changed his tune and said now there can be "NO DOUBT" that THIS virus spreads WITHOUT ANY SYMPTOMS:

January 28: "In all the history of respiratory-born viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks." - Fauci

January 30: The NEJM published a German study, which said the "new virus" can be transmitted asymptomatically.

January 31: The day after the German study came out, Fauci says, Aha! See? We have proof now. This pandemic IS different. Asymptomatic transmission -- there it is. CNN quoted Fauci as saying:

"There's no doubt after reading this paper that asymptomatic transmission is occurring. This study lays the question to rest."

However, just a couple days later, on February 3, Science Magazine reported that the German study was false. As it turned out, the woman cited in the study DID "have symptoms".

Fauci simply ignored the Science article. On February 26, the New York Times ran a scare piece with the title 

"They Were Infected With the Coronavirus. They Never Showed Signs." -- which quotes Fauci as saying:

“I don’t think there’s any question that someone who is without symptoms and carrying the virus can transmit the virus to somebody else."

The only reason Fauci ever said "asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks" was because he was waiting for his cue from a fraudulent study. While the statement was true by itself, it should be clear that the reason he said it was less than honest.

China didn't report asymptomatic cases until APRIL. They went a full three months without any acknowledgement of asymptomatic transmission. 

Sources in the comments. Screenshots below.